Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Aug;69(8):2195-2209.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.17139. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

Variation in propofol induction doses administered to surgical patients over age 65

Affiliations
Observational Study

Variation in propofol induction doses administered to surgical patients over age 65

Robert B Schonberger et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Background/objectives: Advanced age is associated with increased susceptibility to acute adverse effects of propofol. The present study aimed to describe patterns of propofol dosing for induction of general anesthesia before endotracheal intubation in a nationwide sample of older adults presenting for surgery.

Design: Retrospective observational study using the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group data set.

Setting: Thirty-six institutions across the United States.

Participants: A total of 350,766 patients aged over 65 years who received propofol for general anesthetic induction and endotracheal intubation between 2014 and 2018.

Intervention: None.

Measurements: Total induction bolus dose of propofol administered.

Results: The mean (SD) weight-adjusted propofol dose was 1.7 (0.6) mg/kg. The mean prevalent propofol induction dose exceeded the upper bound of what has been described as the typical geriatric dose requirement across every age category examined. The percent of patients receiving propofol induction doses above the described typical geriatric range was 64.8% (95% CI 64.6-65.0), varying from 73.8% among patients aged 65-69 to 45.8% among patients aged 80 and older.

Conclusion: The present study of a large multicenter cohort demonstrates that prevalent propofol dosing commonly falls above the published typically required dose range for patients aged ≥65 in nationwide anesthetic practice. Widespread variability in induction dose administration remains incompletely explained by known patient variables. The nature and clinical consequences of these unexplained dosing decisions remain important topics for further study. Observed discordance between expected and actual induction dosing raises the question of whether there should be reconsideration of widespread provider practice or, alternatively, whether what is published as the typical propofol induction dose range should be revisited.

Keywords: anesthetic induction; geriatric dosing; propofol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Consort Diagram of Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Boxplots of Propofol Dose by Age and ASA Physical Status. Diamonds show the mean and shaded boxes show the 25-75% range with whiskers at 1.5 times the upper and lower bounds. The horizontal dotted line demonstrates the upper limit of the package insert’s listed typical dosing requirement.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Percent of patients receiving Propofol Incremental Induction Dose Above 1.5 mg/kg by Institution is Shown on the Y-axis at left. Shading shows distribution of ASA Physical Status by Institution. Red Dots Demonstrate Mean Age by Institution on the Y-axis at right.

Comment in

References

    1. United States Census Bureau; Quick Facts - Persons 65 years and over, percent; url: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/AGE775219 as accessed June 25, 2020.
    1. Popovic JR. 1999 National Hospital Discharge Survey: annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data. Vital Health Stat 13. 2001;2001September;(151):i–v. - PubMed
    1. Chen X, Mao G, Leng SX. Frailty syndrome: an overview. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:433–41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gilbert T, Neuburger J, Kraindler J, Keeble E, Smith P, Ariti C, et al.Development and validation of a Hospital Frailty Risk Score focusing on older people in acute care settings using electronic hospital records: an observational study. The Lancet. 2018;391(10132):1775–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin H-S, Watts JN, Peel NM, Hubbard RE. Frailty and post-operative outcomes in older surgical patients: a systematic review. BMC Geriatrics. 2016;16(1):157. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types