Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Oct;10(10):1142-1155.
doi: 10.1002/cpdd.936. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

Results of a Dose-Finding Phase 1b Study of Subcutaneous Atezolizumab in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Results of a Dose-Finding Phase 1b Study of Subcutaneous Atezolizumab in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Enriqueta Felip et al. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Intravenous (IV) atezolizumab is approved for non-small cell lung and other cancers. Subcutaneous (SC) atezolizumab coformulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase, a permeation enhancer for SC dispersion and absorption, is being developed to improve treatment options, reduce burden, and increase efficiency for patients and practitioners. IMscin001 (NCT03735121), a 2-part, open-label, global, multicenter, phase 1b/3 study, is evaluating the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of SC atezolizumab. The part 1 (phase 1b) objective was determination of an SC atezolizumab dose yielding a serum trough concentration (Ctrough ) comparable with IV. Patients enrolled in 3 cohorts received SC atezolizumab 1800 mg (thigh) once (cohort 1), 1200 mg (thigh) every 2 weeks for 3 cycles (cohort 2), or 1800 mg (abdomen) every 3 weeks cycle 1, then cycles 2 and 3 (thigh) every 3 weeks (cohort 3). In subsequent cycles, IV atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks was administered until loss of clinical benefit. SC atezolizumab 1800 mg every 3 weeks and 1200 mg every 2 weeks provided similar Ctrough and area under the curve values in cycle 1 to the corresponding IV atezolizumab reference, was well tolerated, and exhibited a safety profile consistent with the established IV formulation. Exposure following SC injection in the abdomen was lower (20%, 28%, and 27% for Ctrough , maximum concentration, and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to day 21, respectively) than in the thigh. Part 1 SC and IV PK data were analyzed using a population PK modeling approach, followed by simulations. Part 2 (phase 3) will now be initiated to demonstrate that SC atezolizumab PK exposure is not lower than that of IV.

Keywords: NSCLC; atezolizumab; hyaluronanidase; pharmacokinetics; subcutaneous.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

L.A.H.‐B. and E.R. are employees of and hold stock in F. Hoffmann‐La Roche. P.C. is an employee of Genentech/Roche and holds stock in Roche Holding Ltd. S.K. is an employee of ProUnlimited. V.M., P.C., and B.W. are employees of Genentech, Inc. E.P., M.M., and N.T. are employees of F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd. M.M. is an employee of Certara and has received consulting fees from Genentech, Inc., in connection with this work. K.T. is an employee of Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and has received financial support from Genentech, Inc. All authors received support for third‐party writing assistance for this manuscript, provided by F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile. CIT, cancer immunotherapy; IV, intravenous; NSCLC, non–small cell lung cancer; SC, subcutaneous. aReason for study exclusion [number]: did not meet eligibility criteria [9] (inadequate hematologic and end‐organ function as determined by laboratory results within 14 days before initiation of study treatment [2]; body mass index too low [2]; treatment with systemic immunosuppressive within 2 weeks before enrollment [2]; severe infection within 4 weeks before initiation of study treatment [1]; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status >1 [1]; hepatitis core antibody B positive [1]); disease progression [3] (symptomatic, untreated, or actively progressing central nervous system metastases [2]; disease progression or recurrence after treatment with a platinum‐containing regimen for NSCLC [1]); withdrawal [1] (withdrew consent during screening [1]); withdrawn by investigator [1] (inability to comply with study protocol, investigator's judgment [1]). bCohort 1: one single dose of atezolizumab SC (in the thigh). Cohort 2: 3 cycles of atezolizumab SC (in the thigh). Cohort 3: 3 cycles of atezolizumab SC (first injection in the abdomen and subsequent injections in the thigh). Loss of clinical benefit includes progressive disease and pseudo‐progression.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Serum atezolizumab cycle 1 concentration vs time profile by cohort (mean ± SD). SC, subcutaneous. aCohort 1: 1800 mg of SC atezolizumab (in the thigh). bCohort 2: 1200 mg of SC atezolizumab (in the thigh). c Cohort 3: 1800 mg of SC atezolizumab (in the abdomen).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Simulated pharmacokinetic profiles of atezolizumab 1875 mg SC administration in the thigh in (A) cycle 1 and (B) at steady state, overlaid with 1200‐mg every‐3‐week IV administration. Solid lines are the medians of geometric means for each simulated dose; shaded areas are the 5th and 95th percentiles interval of geometric means for each simulated dose. IV, intravenous; SC, subcutaneous.

Comment in

  • Subcutaneous Atezolizumab: A Jab Without a Benefit.
    Peer CJ, Zimmerman SM, Figg WD, Goldstein DA, Ratain MJ. Peer CJ, et al. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2022 Jan;11(1):134-135. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.1061. Epub 2021 Dec 23. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2022. PMID: 34951144 No abstract available.

References

    1. Fehrenbacher L, Spira A, Ballinger M, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non‐small‐cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open‐label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10030):1837‐1846. - PubMed
    1. Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non‐small‐cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open‐label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10066):255‐265. - PMC - PubMed
    1. West H, McCleod M, Hussein M, et al. Atezolizumab in combination with carboplatin plus nab‐paclitaxel chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone as first‐line treatment for metastatic non‐squamous non‐small‐cell lung cancer (IMpower130): a multicentre, randomised, open‐label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(7):924‐937. - PubMed
    1. Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, et al. Atezolizumab for first‐line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(24):2288‐2301. - PubMed
    1. Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS, et al. Atezolizumab and nab‐paclitaxel in advanced triple‐negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(22):2108‐2121. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data