Initial Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: Responses from Brief Interviews of Primary Care Providers
- PMID: 33788610
- PMCID: PMC8035915
- DOI: 10.1089/acm.2020.0391
Initial Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: Responses from Brief Interviews of Primary Care Providers
Abstract
Background: In April 2017, the American College of Physicians (ACP) published a clinical practice guideline for low back pain (LBP) recommending nonpharmacologic treatments as first-line therapy for acute, subacute, and chronic LBP. Objective: To assess primary care provider (PCP)-reported initial treatment recommendations for LBP following guideline release. Design: Cross-sectional structured interviews. Participants: Convenience sample of 72 PCPs from 3 community-based outpatient clinics in high- or low-income neighborhoods. Approach: PCPs were interviewed about their familiarity with the ACP guideline, and how they initially manage patients with acute/subacute and chronic LBP. Treatment responses were coded as patient education, nonpharmacologic, pharmacologic, or medical specialty referral. PCPs were also asked about their comfort referring patients to nonpharmacologic treatment providers, and about barriers to referring. Responses were assessed using content analysis. Differences in responses were assessed using descriptive statistics. Key results: Interviews were completed between December 2017 and March 2018. Of 72 participating PCPs (50% male; mean years of practice = 13.8), over three-fourths indicated being familiar with the ACP guideline (76%-87% at 3 clinics). For acute LBP, PCPs typically provided advice to stay active (81%) and pharmacologic management (97%; primarily nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). For chronic LBP, PCPs were more likely to recommend nonpharmacologic treatments than for acute LBP (85% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). The most common nonpharmacologic treatments recommended for chronic LBP were physical therapy (78%), chiropractic care (21%), massage therapy (18%), and acupuncture (17%) (each compared with 0% for acute LBP, all p < 0.001). The cost of nonpharmacologic treatments was perceived as a barrier. However, PCPs working in low-income neighborhood clinics were as likely to recommend nonpharmacologic approaches as those from a high-income neighborhood clinic. Conclusions: While most PCPs indicated they were familiar with the ACP guideline for LBP, nonpharmacologic treatments were not recommended for patients with acute symptoms. Further dissemination and implementation of the ACP guideline are needed.
Keywords: clinical practice guidelines; complementary and integrative health; low back pain; medical education; primary care.
Conflict of interest statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Patient-Reported Physician Treatment Recommendations and Compliance Among U.S. Adults with Low Back Pain.J Altern Complement Med. 2021 Mar;27(S1):S99-S105. doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0392. J Altern Complement Med. 2021. PMID: 33788609 Free PMC article.
-
Are They Complying? Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Readiness to Change Regarding Low Back Pain Treatment Guideline Adherence.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Feb 15;42(4):247-252. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001714. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017. PMID: 28207666
-
Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367. Epub 2017 Feb 14. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28192789
-
Comparing Ways to Treat Low Back Pain and Prevent Chronic Pain and Disability—The TARGET Trial [Internet].Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2021 May. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2021 May. PMID: 38377265 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Managing low back pain in the primary care setting: the know-do gap.Pain Res Manag. 2010 Nov-Dec;15(6):392-400. doi: 10.1155/2010/252695. Pain Res Manag. 2010. PMID: 21165374 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Systematic review of guideline-recommended medications prescribed for treatment of low back pain.Chiropr Man Therap. 2022 May 13;30(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12998-022-00435-3. Chiropr Man Therap. 2022. PMID: 35562756 Free PMC article.
-
Doctors of chiropractic working with or within integrated healthcare delivery systems: a scoping review protocol.BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 25;11(1):e043754. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043754. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 33495261 Free PMC article.
-
Fidelity to the acupuncture intervention protocol in the ACUpuncture In The EmergencY department for pain management (ACUITY) trial: Expanding the gold standard of STRICTA and CONSORT guidelines.Integr Med Res. 2024 Jun;13(2):101048. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2024.101048. Epub 2024 May 10. Integr Med Res. 2024. PMID: 38841077 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in Chiropractic Care and Physical Rehabilitation Use Among Adults with Low Back Pain in the United States, 2002 to 2018.J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Mar;39(4):578-586. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08438-3. Epub 2023 Oct 19. J Gen Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 37856007 Free PMC article.
-
Self-Administered Traction as an Adjunct in the Chiropractic Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Case Report.J Chiropr Med. 2024 Dec;23(4):205-214. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Oct 4. J Chiropr Med. 2024. PMID: 39776823 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, et al. . Noninvasive treatments for low back pain. In: AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), 2016 - PubMed
-
- Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, et al. . Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: A clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2017;166:514–530 - PubMed
-
- Atlas SJ. Management of low back pain: Getting from evidence-based recommendations to high-value care. Ann Intern Med 2017;166:533–534 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous