Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 31;16(3):e0248526.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248526. eCollection 2021.

Automated system for diagnosing endometrial cancer by adopting deep-learning technology in hysteroscopy

Affiliations

Automated system for diagnosing endometrial cancer by adopting deep-learning technology in hysteroscopy

Yu Takahashi et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is a ubiquitous gynecological disease with increasing global incidence. Therefore, despite the lack of an established screening technique to date, early diagnosis of endometrial cancer assumes critical importance. This paper presents an artificial-intelligence-based system to detect the regions affected by endometrial cancer automatically from hysteroscopic images. In this study, 177 patients (60 with normal endometrium, 21 with uterine myoma, 60 with endometrial polyp, 15 with atypical endometrial hyperplasia, and 21 with endometrial cancer) with a history of hysteroscopy were recruited. Machine-learning techniques based on three popular deep neural network models were employed, and a continuity-analysis method was developed to enhance the accuracy of cancer diagnosis. Finally, we investigated if the accuracy could be improved by combining all the trained models. The results reveal that the diagnosis accuracy was approximately 80% (78.91-80.93%) when using the standard method, and it increased to 89% (83.94-89.13%) and exceeded 90% (i.e., 90.29%) when employing the proposed continuity analysis and combining the three neural networks, respectively. The corresponding sensitivity and specificity equaled 91.66% and 89.36%, respectively. These findings demonstrate the proposed method to be sufficient to facilitate timely diagnosis of endometrial cancer in the near future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Kenbun Sone has a joint research agreement with Predicthy LLC. Katsuhiko Noda and Kaname Yoshida are members of Predicthy LLC. The other authors have no competing interests to disclose. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Representative images of detected lesions for conditions of (A) normal endometrium; (B) endometrial polyp; (C) myoma; (D) AEH, and (E) endometrial cancer.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Overall architecture of the model developed in this project.
Fig 3
Fig 3
(A) Schematic of the training method: The training data pertaining to the malignant class were separated into two sets, Set X and Set Y. (B) Schematic of the evaluation method: image by image. (C) Schematic of the evaluation method: video unit. During image-by-image evaluation, 100 images that clearly included the lesion site were extracted from the hysteroscopic video of each patient diagnosed with a malignant tumor (Continuity analysis).
Fig 4
Fig 4
(A) Trend depicting accuracy displacement of malignant and benign diagnoses in accordance with threshold value for continuity analysis. (B) Comparison between learning times required by the three neural networks. The physical time depends on the computer specifications and image size; however, the ratio of the learning time required by each network is independent of such conditions.(C) Average accuracy values obtained via image-by-image-based predictions grouped in terms of dataset and network type. (D) Average accuracy values obtained via video-unit-based predictions grouped in terms of dataset and network type.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Average diagnostic accuracies for different conditions obtained using combination of 72 trained deep neural network models.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson AS, Key TJ, Norat T, Scoccianti C, Cecchini M, Berrino F, et al.. European code against cancer 4th edition: Obesity, body fatness and cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015;39: S34–45. 10.1016/j.canep.2015.01.017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lachance JA, Darus CJ, Rice LW. Surgical management and postoperative treatment of endometrial carcinoma. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008;1(3): 97–105. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harrison RF, He W, Fu S, Zhao H, Sun CC, Suidan RS, et al.. National patterns of care and fertility outcomes for reproductive-aged women with endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(5): 474.e1-474.e11. 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.029 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meggiolaro A, Unim B, Semyonov L, Miccoli S, Maffongelli E, La Torre G. The role of pap test screening against cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Ter. 2016;167(4): 124–39. 10.7417/CT.2016.1942 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yanoh K, Norimatsu Y, Hirai Y, Takeshima N, Kamimori A, Nakamura Y, et al.. New diagnostic reporting format for endometrial cytology based on cytoarchitectural criteria. Cytopathology 2009;20(6): 388–394. 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00581.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types