Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;124(1):16-24.
doi: 10.1002/jso.26478. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

Childhood cancer survivors face markedly worse overall survival after diagnosis with breast cancer, melanoma, or colorectal cancer

Affiliations

Childhood cancer survivors face markedly worse overall survival after diagnosis with breast cancer, melanoma, or colorectal cancer

Kevin T Lynch et al. J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at elevated risk of secondary malignancies (SM). Enhanced screening for SM is recommended, but compliance is poor. We hypothesized that CCS with adult-onset SM (colorectal cancer [CRC], melanoma, or breast cancer [BC]) would present with more advanced disease and have decreased overall survival (OS).

Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was queried for patients diagnosed with cancer at age less than or equal to 18 also diagnosed with adult-onset CRC, melanoma, or BC. A cohort without a history of prior malignancy was likewise identified. Tumor features and clinical outcomes were compared.

Results: CCS with a SM (n = 224) were compared with patients without a childhood cancer history (n = 1,392,670). CCS were diagnosed younger (BC = 37.6 vs. 61.3, p < 0.01, CRC = 35.0 vs. 67.1, p < 0.01, melanoma = 29.6 vs. 61.3 years old, p < 0.01). CCS with BC were more likely to have Stage III or IV disease (25.2% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.01). Hormone-receptor expression also differed; CCS were less likely to develop Luminal A-type tumors (48.6% vs. 66.9%, p = 0.01). After age-adjustment, CCS had worse OS (Hazard ratio: CRC = 2.449, p < 0.01, melanoma = 6.503, p < 0.01, BC = 3.383, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: CCS were younger when diagnosed with a SM. After age-adjustment, OS was diminished. Heightened surveillance may be necessary for CCS diagnosed with SM.

Keywords: breast cancer; colorectal cancer; melanoma; secondary malignancy; survivorship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest:

The authors have no conflicts of interest or disclosures relative to the present work.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Overall Survival after CRC Diagnosis.
A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve comparing OS of CCS with colorectal cancer patients without a history of childhood cancer. Shading indicated 95% CI. Unadjusted median OS 92 vs. 72 months, respectively. Log-rank p-value = 0.272. B) Cox-Multivariate Regression modeling of OS with Age as a Co-variate. Survival probability of CCS vs. non-CCS patients 160 months after CRC diagnosis: 10.2% vs. 33.4%, p-value <0.01, median OS 19 vs. 74 months. Hazard ratio (95% CI) of CCS = 2.449 (1.543-3.888).
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Overall Survival after Melanoma Diagnosis.
A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve comparing OS of CCS with melanoma patients without a history of childhood cancer. Shading indicated 95% CI. Unadjusted median OS not reached at 160 months. Log-rank p-value = 0.532. B) Cox-Multivariate Regression modeling of OS with Age as a Co-variate. Survival probability of CCS vs. non-CCS patients 160 months after CRC diagnosis: 16.2% vs. 60.1%, p-value <0.01, median OS 32 months vs. not reached. Hazard ratio (95% CI) of CCS = 6.503 (3.251-13.011).
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. Overall Survival after Breast Cancer Diagnosis.
A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve comparing OS of CCS with breast cancer patients without a history of childhood cancer. Shading indicated 95% CI. Unadjusted median OS not reached at 160 months. Log-rank p-value = 0.7662. B) Cox-Multivariate Regression modeling of OS with Age as a Co-variate. Survival probability of CCS vs. non-CSS patients 160 months after BC diagnosis: 24.6% vs. 59.8%, p-value <0.01, median OS 67 months vs. not reached. Hazard ratio (95% CI) of CCS = 3.383 (2.210-5.179).
Figure 4:
Figure 4:. Cox-Regression Model of Overall Survival by Stage after Breast Cancer Diagnosis.
A) Stage I, age-adjusted OS probability at 160 months: 17.8 vs. 70.6 months, p-value<0.01. B) Stage II, age-adjusted OS probability at 160 months: 34.9 vs. 62.8 months, p-value=0.07. C) Stage III, age-adjusted OS probability at 160 months: 15.1 vs. 43.3 months, p-value<0.01. D) Stage IV, age-adjusted OS probability at 160 months: 4.3 vs. 8.2 months, p-value=0.66.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Daniel CL, Armstrong GT, Keske RR, et al. Advancing Survivors’ Knowledge (ASK) about skin cancer study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:109. doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0637-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Phillips SM, Padgett LS, Leisenring WM, et al. Survivors of Childhood Cancer in the United States: Prevalence and Burden of Morbidity. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev Publ Am Assoc Cancer Res Cosponsored Am Soc Prev Oncol. 2015;24(4):653–663. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1418 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armstrong GT, Stovall M, Robison LL. Long-term effects of radiation exposure among adult survivors of childhood cancer: results from the childhood cancer survivor study. Radiat Res. 2010;174(6):840–850. doi:10.1667/RR1903.1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turcotte LM, Neglia JP, Reulen RC, et al. Risk, Risk Factors, and Surveillance of Subsequent Malignant Neoplasms in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Review. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2018;36(21):2145–2152. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.76.7764 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Friedman DL, Whitton J, Leisenring W, et al. Subsequent neoplasms in 5-year survivors of childhood cancer: the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(14):1083–1095. doi:10.1093/jnci/djq238 - DOI - PMC - PubMed