Provision of medication abortion in Hawai'i during COVID-19: Practical experience with multiple care delivery models
- PMID: 33789080
- PMCID: PMC8005318
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.025
Provision of medication abortion in Hawai'i during COVID-19: Practical experience with multiple care delivery models
Abstract
Objective: To demonstrate the effectiveness of medication abortion with the implementation of telemedicine and a no-test protocol in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who had a medication abortion up to 77 days gestation at the University of Hawai'i between April and November 2020. Patients had the option of traditional in clinic care or telemedicine with either in clinic pickup or mailing of medications. During this time, a no-test protocol for medication abortion without prior labs or ultrasound was in place for eligible patients. The primary outcome was the rate of successful medication abortion without surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes included abortion-related complications.
Results: A total of 334 patients were dispensed mifepristone and misoprostol, 149 (44.6%) with telemedicine with in-person pickup of medications, 75 (22.5%) via telemedicine with medications mailed, and 110 (32.9%) via traditional in person visits. The overall rate of complete medication abortion without surgical intervention was 95.8%, with success rates of 96.8, 97.1, and 93.6% for the clinic pickup, mail, and clinic visit groups, respectively. Success for those without an ultrasound performed prior to the procedure was 96.6%, compared to 95.5% for those with ultrasound. We obtained follow-up data for 87.8% of participants.
Conclusions: Medication abortion was safe and effective while offering multiple modes of care delivery including telemedicine visits without an ultrasound performed prior to dispensing medications.
Implications: Incorporating telemedicine and a no-test protocol for medication abortion is safe and has the potential to expand access to abortion care. All care models had low rates of adverse events, which contradicts the idea that the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategyincreases the safety of medication abortion.
Keywords: COVID-19; Medication abortion; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Telemedicine; Ultrasound.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparison of No-Test Telehealth and In-Person Medication Abortion.JAMA. 2024 Sep 17;332(11):898-905. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.10680. JAMA. 2024. PMID: 38913394 Free PMC article.
-
Mail-Order Pharmacy Dispensing of Mifepristone for Medication Abortion After In-Person Screening.JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Aug 1;184(8):873-881. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1476. JAMA Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 38739404 Free PMC article.
-
TelAbortion: evaluation of a direct to patient telemedicine abortion service in the United States.Contraception. 2019 Sep;100(3):173-177. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.05.013. Epub 2019 Jun 4. Contraception. 2019. PMID: 31170384
-
Follow-up strategies to confirm the success of medical abortion of pregnancies up to 10 weeks' gestation: a systematic review with meta-analyses.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;222(6):551-563.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1244. Epub 2019 Nov 9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31715147
-
An overview of medical abortion for clinical practice.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014 Jan;69(1):39-45. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000017. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014. PMID: 25102250 Review.
Cited by
-
Telemedicine for First-Trimester Medical Abortion in Canada: Results of a 2019 Survey.Telemed J E Health. 2023 May;29(5):686-695. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0245. Epub 2022 Sep 20. Telemed J E Health. 2023. PMID: 36126299 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of telehealth versus in-person care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Jun 15;7(1):157. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01152-2. NPJ Digit Med. 2024. PMID: 38879682 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Person-centered abortion care scale: Validation for medication abortion in the United States.Contraception. 2024 Sep;137:110485. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110485. Epub 2024 May 15. Contraception. 2024. PMID: 38754758 Free PMC article.
-
Reproductive justice in the time of COVID-19: a systematic review of the indirect impacts of COVID-19 on sexual and reproductive health.Reprod Health. 2021 Dec 20;18(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01286-6. Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 34930318 Free PMC article.
-
Fear of procedure and pain in individuals considering abortion: A qualitative study.Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Mar;108:107611. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.107611. Epub 2022 Dec 19. Patient Educ Couns. 2023. PMID: 36603469 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Grossman D., Grindlay K. Safety of medical abortion provided through telemedicine compared with in person. Obstet gynecol. 2017;130:778–782. - PubMed
-
- Grossman D., Grindlay K., Buchacker T., Lane K., Blanchard K. Effectiveness and acceptability of medical abortion provided through telemedicine. Obstet gynecol. 2011;118:296–303. - PubMed
-
- Raymond E., Chong E., Winikoff B., Platais I., Mary M., Lotarevich T., et al. TelAbortion: evaluation of a direct to patient telemedicine abortion service in the United States. Contraception. 2019;100:173–177. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous