Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;71(3):561-567.
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322192. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

Non-compliance with colonoscopy after a positive faecal immunochemical test doubles the risk of dying from colorectal cancer

Affiliations

Non-compliance with colonoscopy after a positive faecal immunochemical test doubles the risk of dying from colorectal cancer

Manuel Zorzi et al. Gut. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) among subjects with a positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) who do not undergo a colonoscopy is unknown. We estimated whether non-compliance with colonoscopy after a positive FIT is associated with increased CRC incidence and mortality.

Methods: The FIT-based CRC screening programme in the Veneto region (Italy) invited persons aged 50 to 69 years with a positive FIT (>20 µg Hb/g faeces) for diagnostic colonoscopy at an endoscopic referral centre. In this retrospective cohort study, we compared the 10-year cumulative CRC incidence and mortality among FIT positives who completed a diagnostic colonoscopy within the programme (compliers) and those who did not (non-compliers), using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox-Aalen models.

Results: Some 88 013 patients who were FIT positive complied with colonoscopy (males: 56.1%; aged 50-59 years: 49.1%) while 23 410 did not (males: 54.6%; aged 50-59 years: 44.9%).The 10-year cumulative incidence of CRC was 44.7 per 1000 (95% CI, 43.1 to 46.3) among colonoscopy compliers and 54.3 per 1000 (95% CI, 49.9 to 58.7) in non-compliers, while the cumulative mortality for CRC was 6.8 per 1000 (95% CI, 5.9 to 7.6) and 16.0 per 1000 (95% CI, 13.1 to 18.9), respectively. The risk of dying of CRC among non-compliers was 103% higher than among compliers (adjusted HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.68 to 2.44).

Conclusion: The excess risk of CRC death among those not completing colonoscopy after a positive faecal occult blood test should prompt screening programmes to adopt effective interventions to increase compliance in this high-risk population.

Keywords: cancer prevention; colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; colorectal cancer screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative incidence of CRC (per 1000) in a cohort of subjects with a positive FIT, according to compliance with follow-up colonoscopy. CRC, colorectal cancer; FIT, faecal immunochemical test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative CRC-specific mortality (per 1000) in a cohort of subjects with a positive FIT, according to compliance with follow-up colonoscopy. CRC, colorectal cancer; FIT, faecal immunochemical test.

Comment in

References

    1. Lauby-Secretan B, Vilahur N, Bianchini F, et al. . The IARC perspective on colorectal cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1734–40. 10.1056/NEJMsr1714643 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basu P, Ponti A, Anttila A, et al. . Status of implementation and organization of cancer screening in the European Union member States-Summary results from the second European screening report. Int J Cancer 2018;142:44–56. 10.1002/ijc.31043 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer . Colorectal cancer screening in Canada: monitoring & evaluation of quality indicators – results report, January 2013 – December 2014, 2017.
    1. Schreuders EH, Ruco A, Rabeneck L, et al. . Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes. Gut 2015;64:1637–49. 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-309086 - DOI - PubMed
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force, Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, et al. . Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services Task force recommendation statement. JAMA 2016;315:2564–75. 10.1001/jama.2016.5989 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types