Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 31;7(1):13.
doi: 10.1038/s41526-021-00141-z.

Macrophages in microgravity: the impact of space on immune cells

Affiliations
Review

Macrophages in microgravity: the impact of space on immune cells

Christopher Ludtka et al. NPJ Microgravity. .

Abstract

The effects of a microgravity environment on the myriad types of immune cells present within the human body have been assessed both by bench-scale simulation and suborbital methods, as well as in true spaceflight. Macrophages have garnered increased research interest in this context in recent years. Their functionality in both immune response and tissue remodeling makes them a unique cell to investigate in regards to gravisensitive effects as well as parameters of interest that could impact astronaut health. Here, we review and summarize the literature investigating the effects of microgravity on macrophages and monocytes regarding the microgravity environment simulation/generation methods, cell sources, experiment durations, and parameters of interest utilized within the field. We discuss reported findings on the impacts of microgravity on macrophage/monocyte structure, adhesion and migration, proliferation, genetic expression, cytokine secretion, and reactive oxygen species production, as well as polarization. Based on this body of data, we make recommendations to the field for careful consideration of experimental design to complement existing reports, as the multitude of disparate study methods previously published can make drawing direct comparisons difficult. However, the breadth of different testing methodologies can also lend itself to attempting to identify the most robust and consistent responses to microgravity across various testing conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Representative examples of experimental methods used to simulate microgravity.
Panels a, b show digital images of a rotating wall vessel (RWV) bioreactor. Here vascular cells are grown in culture chambers which are then rotated concentrically around a single axis. Panel c shows a RPM with two independently driven perpendicular frames. Panel d shows the parabolic flight trajectory used to create short-duration microgravity exposure.

References

    1. Blaber, E., Marçal, H. & Burns, B. P. Bioastronautics: the influence of microgravity on astronaut health. Astrobiology10.1089/ast.2009.0415 (2010). - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine (IOM). Safe Passage: Astronaut Care for Exploration Missions. (National Academies Press, US, 2001). - PubMed
    1. Hughes‐Fulford, M. To infinity … and beyond! Human spaceflight and life science. FASEB J. 10.1096/fj.11-0902ufm (2011). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Varol, C., Mildner, A. & Jung, S. Macrophages: development and tissue specialization. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-112220 (2015). - PubMed
    1. Brungs, S., Hauslage, J. & Hemmersbach, R. Validation of random positioning versus clinorotation using a macrophage model system. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 10.1007/s12217-019-9687-0 (2019).

LinkOut - more resources