Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2021 Mar 25:2021.03.16.21253634.
doi: 10.1101/2021.03.16.21253634.

Pre-pandemic Cognitive Function and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Cohort Study

G David Batty  1 , Ian J Deary  2 , Chloe Fawns-Ritchie  3 , Catharine R Gale  4   2 , Drew Altschul  3
Affiliations

Pre-pandemic Cognitive Function and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Cohort Study

G David Batty et al. medRxiv. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: Whereas several predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy have been examined, the role of cognitive function following the widely publicised development of an inoculation is unknown.

Objective: To test the association between scores from an array of cognitive function tests and self-reported vaccine hesitancy after the announcement of the successful testing of the Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccine.

Design setting and participants: We used individual-level data from a pandemic-focused study (COVID Survey), a prospective cohort study nested within Understanding Society (Main Survey). In the week immediately following the announcement of successful testing of the first efficacious inoculation (November/December 2020), data on vaccine intentionality were collected in 11740 individuals (6702 women) aged 16-95. Pre-pandemic scores on general cognitive function, ascertained from a battery of six tests, were captured in 2011/12 wave of the Main Survey.

Measurements: Self-reported intention to take up a vaccination for COVID-19. To summarise our results, we computed odds ratios with accompanying 95% confidence intervals for general cognitive function adjusted for selected covariates.

Results: Of the study sample, 17.2% (N=1842) indicated they were hesitant about having the vaccine. After adjustment for age, sex, and ethnicity, study members with a lower baseline cognition score were markedly more likely to be vaccine hesitant (odds ratio per standard deviation lower score in cognition; 95% confidence interval: 1.76; 1.62, 1.90). Adjustment for mental and physical health plus household shielding status had no impact on these results, whereas controlling for educational attainment led to partial attenuation but the probability of hesitancy was still elevated (1.52; 1.37, 1.67). There was a linear association for vaccine hesitancy across the full range of cognition scores (p for trend: p<0.0001).

Limitations: Our outcome was based on intention rather than behaviour.

Conclusions: Erroneous social media reports might have complicated personal decision-making, leading to people with lower cognitive ability test scores being vaccine-hesitant. With people with lower cognition also experiencing higher rates of COVID-19 in studies conducted prior to vaccine distribution, these new findings are suggestive of a potential additional disease burden.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow of cohort members into the analytical sample: Main Survey and COVID Survey in Understanding Society
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Odds ratios (95% CI) for the relation of general cognitive function with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Understanding Society All covariates are: age, sex, ethnicity, somatic comorbidity, psychological distress, shielding, and education. In both models, the p-value for trend across deciles was <0.0001
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Deary IJ, Batty GD. Cognitive epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61(5):378–384. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deary IJ. Intelligence. Annu Rev Psychol 2012;63:453–82. - PubMed
    1. Gottfredson LS. Intelligence: is it the epidemiologists’ elusive “fundamental cause” of social class inequalities in health? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol 2004;86(1):174–199. - PubMed
    1. Batty GD, Deary IJ, Schoon I, Gale CR. Childhood mental ability in relation to food intake and physical activity in adulthood: the 1970 British Cohort Study. Pediatrics 2007;119(1):e38–e45. - PubMed
    1. Whalley L, Fox H, Lemmon H, Duthie S, Collins A, Peace H, Starr J, Deary I. Dietary supplement use in old age: associations with childhood IQ, current cognition and health. International journal of geriatric psychiatry 2003;18(9):769–776. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources