Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;37(1):125-129.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06744-2. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

Compliance with CDIM-APDIM Guidelines for Department of Medicine Letters: an Opportunity to Improve Communication Across the Continuum

Allison H Ferris  1 , Anne G Pereira  2 , Steven V Angus  3 , Richard I Kopelman  4
Affiliations

Compliance with CDIM-APDIM Guidelines for Department of Medicine Letters: an Opportunity to Improve Communication Across the Continuum

Allison H Ferris et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Background: With rising applications to internal medicine programs and pending changes in United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 score reporting, program directors desire transparent data for comparing applicants. The Department of Medicine Letters of Recommendation (DOM LORs) are frequently used to assess applicants and have the potential to provide clearly defined data on performance including stratification of a medical school class. Despite published guidelines on the expected content of the DOM LOR, these LORs do not always meet that need.

Objectives: To better understand the degree to which DOM LORs comply with published guidelines.

Methods: We reviewed DOM LORs from 146 of 155 LCME-accredited medical schools in the 2019 Match cycle, assessing for compliance with published guidelines.

Results: Adherence to the recommendation for DOM LORs to provide a final characterization of performance relative to peers was low (68/146, 47%). Of those that provided a final characterization, 19/68 (28%) provided a quantitative measure, and 49/68 (72%) provided a qualitative descriptor. Only 17/49 (35%) with qualitative terms described those terms, and thirteen distinct qualitative scales were identified. Ranking systems varied, with seven different titles given to highest performers. Explanations about determination of ranking groups were provided in 12% of cases.

Conclusions: Adherence to published guidelines for DOM LORs varies but is generally low. For program directors desiring transparent data to use in application review, clearly defined data on student performance, stratification groupings, and common language across schools could improve the utility of DOM LORs.

Keywords: letters of recommendation; medical education; residency application.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Results.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. AAMC Preliminary ERAS Data for 2021. Internal Medicine Categorical data. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/interactive-data/eras-statistics-data Accessed 3 Feb 2021.
    1. Pereira AG, Chelminski PR, Chheda SG, Angus SA, et al. Application inflation for internal medicine applicants in the match: drivers, consequences, and potential solutions. Am J Med. 2016;129(48):885–891. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.04.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Angus SV, Williams CM, Stewart EA, Sweet M, Kisielewski M, Willett LL. Internal medicine residency program directors’ screening practices and perceptions about recruitment challenges. Acad Med. 2020;94(4):582–9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003086. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Recommendations for revising the medical student performance evaluation. AAMC Publication. https://www.aamc.org/system/files/c/2/470400-mspe-recommendations.pdf Accessed 18 May 2020.
    1. Hom J, Richman I, Hall P, Ahuja N, Harman S, Harrington R, et al. The state of medical student performance evaluations: improved transparency or continued obfuscation? Acad Med. 2016;91:1534–1539. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001034. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources