Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;16(2):374-387.
doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01032-8. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

Evaluating implementation and pragmatism of cancer-specific exercise programs: a scoping review

Graeme M Purdy  1 , Frances M Sobierajski  1 , Naomi D Dolgoy  1 , Margaret L McNeely  2   3
Affiliations

Evaluating implementation and pragmatism of cancer-specific exercise programs: a scoping review

Graeme M Purdy et al. J Cancer Surviv. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Studies in exercise oncology are increasingly evaluating the implementation of cancer-specific exercise programming in real-world settings. Evaluating current implementation efforts and identifying current research gaps may inform future implementation. This scoping review explores studies implementing cancer-specific exercise programs to determine their pragmatic characteristics and evaluate potential for translation into practice.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using five databases (up to July 2020) to identify implementation studies that used qualitative or quantitative methods. Program pragmatism was evaluated using the PRECIS/RE-AIM tool.

Results: Fourteen articles were included for review. While programs were moderately pragmatic (average: 3.4; range: 2.8-4.2), variability was observed between scoring domains. Programs scored higher (more pragmatic) in domains typical for effectiveness studies, including participant eligibility, follow-up intensity, primary trial outcome, and analysis of primary outcome. In contrast, programs scored lower (less pragmatic) in domains aligned with implementation science, including intervention flexibility, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Limited information was reported regarding program fidelity, adaptations, and maintenance/sustainability.

Conclusion: Researchers should consider the pragmatism of interventions, the nuances of program adoption and implementation at the setting level, and the transition and integration of programming into the healthcare system. Future studies may benefit from the inclusion of decision-makers and implementation experts and shifting focus towards flexible programming. PRECIS/RE-AIM may facilitate the evaluation of programs throughout the study design and implementation process.

Implications for cancer survivors: The implementation of pragmatic exercise programs that are both scalable and sustainable is needed so that cancer survivors can experience exercise-related benefits beyond research settings.

Keywords: Clinical care; Exercise; Implementation science; Pragmatism; Review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. - DOI
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN Cancer Statistics 2020. December 2020. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home .
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7–34. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21551 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Bower JE. Management of cancer-related fatigue. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2006;4(11):828–9. - PubMed
    1. Pitman A, Suleman S, Hyde N, Hodgkiss A. Depression and anxiety in patients with cancer. BMJ. 2018;361:k1415. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k1415 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources