Breast Reconstruction Completion in the Obese: Does Reconstruction Technique Make a Difference in Its Achievement?
- PMID: 33792005
- PMCID: PMC8948524
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726031
Breast Reconstruction Completion in the Obese: Does Reconstruction Technique Make a Difference in Its Achievement?
Abstract
Background: Breast mound and nipple creation are the goals of the reconstructive process. Unlike in normal body mass index (BMI) women, breast reconstruction in the obese is associated with increased risk of perioperative complications. Our aim was to determine if reconstruction technique and the incidence of perioperative complications affect the achievement of reconstruction completion in the obese female.
Methods: Consecutive obese women (BMI ≥30) who underwent mastectomy and implant or autologous reconstruction were evaluated for the completion of breast reconstruction.
Results: Two hundred twenty-five women with 352 reconstructions were included. Seventy-four women underwent 111 autologous reconstructions and 151 women underwent 241 implant-based reconstructions. Chemotherapy, radiation, and delayed reconstruction timing was more common in the autologous patients. Major perioperative complications (requiring hospital readmission or unplanned surgery) occurred more frequently in the implant group (p ≤ 0.0001). Breast mounds were completed in >98% of autologous cases compared with 76% of implant cases (p ≤ 0.001). Nipple areolar complex (NAC) creation was completed in 57% of autologous patients and 33% of implant patients (p = 0.0009). The rate of successfully completing the breast mound and the NAC was higher in the autologous patient group (Mound odds ratio or OR 3.32, 95% confidence interval or CI 1.36-5.28 and NAC OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.50-4.69).
Conclusion: Occurrence of a major complication in the implant group decreased the rate of reconstruction completion. Obese women who undergo autologous breast reconstruction are more likely to achieve breast reconstruction completion when compared with obese women who undergo implant-based breast reconstruction.
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes Following Breast Reconstruction in Patients With Prior Mantle Radiation for Treatment of Hodgkin's Lymphoma.Ann Plast Surg. 2020 May;84(5):507-511. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002087. Ann Plast Surg. 2020. PMID: 31663939
-
Time to completion of nipple reconstruction: what factors are involved?Ann Plast Surg. 2013 May;70(5):530-2. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318281ac61. Ann Plast Surg. 2013. PMID: 23542858
-
Comparison of Outcomes with Tissue Expander, Immediate Implant, and Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Greater Than 1000 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jun;139(6):1300-1310. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003340. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017. PMID: 28538548
-
Trends in tertiary breast reconstruction: literature review and single centre experience.Breast. 2013 Apr;22(2):173-178. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 11. Breast. 2013. PMID: 22795362 Review.
-
Local recurrence of mammary Paget's disease after nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant breast reconstruction: a case report and literature review.World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep 6;20(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02746-4. World J Surg Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36064544 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Postoperative Outcomes in Prepectoral Versus Retropectoral Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Across Body Mass Index Categories.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Jan 10;13(1):e6425. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006425. eCollection 2025 Jan. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025. PMID: 39802279 Free PMC article.
-
Breast reconstruction after mastectomy in patients with obesity: a narrative review.Ann Transl Med. 2023 Dec 20;11(12):413. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-1599. Epub 2023 Sep 20. Ann Transl Med. 2023. PMID: 38213816 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Methodological Quality of Open Access Compared to Traditional Journal Publications in the Plastic Surgery Literature.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Dec;47(6):2853-2861. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03319-w. Epub 2023 Mar 30. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023. PMID: 36997736 Review.
References
-
- Sisco M, Johnson DB, Wang C, Rasinski K, Rundell VL, Yao KA. The quality-of-life benefits of breast reconstruction do not diminish with age. J Surg Oncol 2015;111(06):663–668 - PubMed
-
- Ng SK, Hare RM, Kuang RJ, Smith KM, Brown BJ, Hunter-Smith DJ. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy patient satisfaction and decision making. Ann Plast Surg 2016;76(06):640–644 - PubMed
-
- Kim MK, Kim T, Moon HG, et al. Effect of cosmetic outcome on quality of life after breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41(03):426–432 - PubMed
-
- Rowland JH, Desmond KA, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR, Wyatt GE, Ganz PA. Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92(17):1422–1429 - PubMed
-
- Cho EH, Shammas RL, Glener AD, Greenup RA, Hwang ES, Hollenbeck ST. The impact of autologous breast reconstruction on body mass index patterns in breast cancer patients: a propensity-matched analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140(06):1121–1131 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical