Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jun 1;147(6):544-552.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.0288.

Radioiodine Remnant Ablation for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Radioiodine Remnant Ablation for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Danielle L James et al. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Postoperative radioactive iodine (RAI) remnant ablation for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) facilitates the early detection of recurrence and represents an adjuvant therapy that targets persistent microscopic disease. The optimal activity of RAI in low- and intermediate-risk DTC remains controversial.

Objective: To evaluate the long-term cure rate of different RAI activities in low- and intermediate-risk DTC. Secondary outcomes included successful remnant ablation, adverse effects, and hospital length of stay.

Data source: A systematic search of the databases PubMed, Cochrane Collaboration, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared long-term outcomes (>12 months) for American Thyroid Association-classified low- and intermediate-risk DTC based on receipt of either low-activity or high-activity RAI postoperatively.

Study selection: All RCTs or observational studies evaluating patients with low- and intermediate-risk DTC who were treated initially with total/near-total thyroidectomy, followed by remnant RAI ablation with either low or high activities. Eligible studies had to present odds ratio, relative risk (RR), or hazard ratio estimates (with 95% CIs), standard errors, or the number of events necessary to calculate these for the outcome of interest rate.

Data extraction: Two investigators reviewed the literature in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Dichotomous variables were pooled as risk ratios and continuous data as weighted-mean differences. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa and Jadad scales.

Main outcomes and measures: Disease recurrence was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included successful ablation, adverse effects, and length of stay.

Results: Ten studies that included 3821 patients met inclusion criteria, including 6 RCTs and 4 observational studies. There was no difference in long-term cure recurrence rates (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.62-1.27, P = .50) or successful remnant ablation (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.87-1.03; P = .20) between low-activity and high-activity RAI.

Conclusions and relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, low-activity RAI was comparable with high-activity RAI regarding successful ablation and recurrence rates. This suggests that low-activity RAI is preferable to high-activity in low- and intermediate-risk DTC because of its similar efficacy but reduced morbidity.

Trial registration: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42020166780.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Flow Diagram
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Forest Plots Comparing Recurrence Rates Between Low-Activity and High-Activity Radioactive Iodine (RAI), Including a Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) Subgroup Analysis
M-H indicates Mantel-Haenszel.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Forest Plots Comparing Ablation
A, Comparison of successful ablation rates between low-activity and high-activity radioactive iodine (RAI), including a randomized clinical trial (RCT) subgroup analysis. B, Comparison of the need for further ablation. M-H indicates Mantel-Haenszel.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Risk of Bias Graph and Summary

References

    1. Tuttle RM, Lopez N, Leboeuf R, et al. . Radioactive iodine administered for thyroid remnant ablation following recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone preparation also has an important adjuvant therapy function. Thyroid. 2010;20(3):257-263. doi:10.1089/thy.2009.0401 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sawka AM, Thephamongkhol K, Brouwers M, Thabane L, Browman G, Gerstein HC. Clinical review 170: A systematic review and metaanalysis of the effectiveness of radioactive iodine remnant ablation for well-differentiated thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(8):3668-3676. doi:10.1210/jc.2003-031167 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. . 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1-133. doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davies L, Welch HG. Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the United States, 1973-2002. JAMA. 2006;295(18):2164-2167. doi:10.1001/jama.295.18.2164 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davies L, Welch HG. Current thyroid cancer trends in the United States. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140(4):317-322. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances