Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep;413(22):5551-5559.
doi: 10.1007/s00216-021-03311-w. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

Recent trends in drugs of abuse metabolism studies for mass spectrometry-based analytical screening procedures

Affiliations
Review

Recent trends in drugs of abuse metabolism studies for mass spectrometry-based analytical screening procedures

Lea Wagmann et al. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

The still increasing number of drugs of abuse, particularly the so-called new psychoactive substances (NPS), poses an analytical challenge for clinical and forensic toxicologists but also for doping control. NPS usually belong to various classes such as synthetic cannabinoids, phenethylamines, opioids, or benzodiazepines. Like other xenobiotics, NPS undergo absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion processes after consumption, but only very limited data concerning their toxicokinetics and safety properties is available once they appear on the market. The inclusion of metabolites in mass spectral libraries is often crucial for the detection of NPS especially in urine screening approaches. Authentic human samples may represent the gold standard for identification of metabolites but are often not available and clinical studies cannot be performed due to ethical concerns. However, numerous alternative in vitro and in vivo models are available. This trends article will give an overview on selected models, discuss current studies, and highlight recent developments.

Keywords: In vitro toxicology; In vivo toxicology; Mass spectrometry; Metabolism; New psychoactive substances; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The content of this article required no approval from an ethics committee. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Wagmann L, Maurer HH. Bioanalytical methods for new psychoactive substances. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2018;252:413–439. doi: 10.1007/164_2017_83. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peters FT, Meyer MR. In vitro approaches to studying the metaboslism of new psychoactive compounds. Drug Test Anal. 2011;3(7–8):483–495. doi: 10.1002/dta.295. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diao X, Huestis MA. New synthetic cannabinoids metabolism and strategies to best identify optimal marker metabolites. Front Chem. 2019;7:109. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00109. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ellefsen KN, Concheiro M, Huestis MA. Synthetic cathinone pharmacokinetics, analytical methods, and toxicological findings from human performance and postmortem cases. Drug Metab Rev. 2016;48(2):237–265. doi: 10.1080/03602532.2016.1188937. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richter LHJ, Flockerzi V, Maurer HH, Meyer MR. Pooled human liver preparations, HepaRG, or HepG2 cell lines for metabolism studies of new psychoactive substances? A study using MDMA, MDBD, butylone, MDPPP, MDPV, MDPB, 5-MAPB, and 5-API as examples. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2017;143:32–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.05.028. - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources