Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb;111(2):373-381.
doi: 10.1002/cpt.2248. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

Perspectives on Virtual (Remote) Clinical Trials as the "New Normal" to Accelerate Drug Development

Affiliations
Review

Perspectives on Virtual (Remote) Clinical Trials as the "New Normal" to Accelerate Drug Development

Demissie Alemayehu et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Although the digital revolution has transformed many areas of human endeavor, pharmaceutical drug development has been relatively slow to embrace the emerging technologies to enhance efficiency and optimize value in clinical trials. The topic has garnered even greater attention in the face of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, which has caused unprecedented disruption in the conduct of clinical trials and presented considerable challenges and opportunities for clinical trialists and data analysts. In this paper, we highlight the potential opportunity with virtual or digital clinical trials as viable options to enhance efficiency in drug development and, more importantly, in offering diverse patients easier and attractive means to participate in clinical trials. Special reference is made to the implication of artificial intelligence and machine-learning tools in trial execution and data acquisition, processing, and analysis in a virtual trial setting. Issues of patient safety, measurement validity, and data integrity are reviewed, and considerations are put forth with reference to the mitigation of underlying regulatory and operational barriers.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. DiMasi, J.A., Grabowski, H.G. & Hansen, R.W. Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: new estimates of R&D costs. J. Health Econ. 47, 20-33 (2016).
    1. Unger, J.M. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the magnitude of structural, clinical, and physician and patient barriers to cancer clinical trial participation. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 111, 245-255 (2019).
    1. Center for Information and Study on Clinical Research Participation (CISCRP), 2016 <https://www.ciscrp.org/inc-research-and-ciscrp-launch-inspiring-hope-ide....
    1. Retention in clinical trials - keeping patients on protocols. 2015 <https://www.meddeviceonline.com/doc/retention-clinical-trials-keeping-pa....
    1. Carlisle, B. et al. Unsuccessful trial accrual and human subjects protections: an empirical analysis of recently closed trials. Clin. Trials 12, 77-83 (2015).

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources