Regeneration in anamniotes was replaced by regengrow and scarring in amniotes after land colonization and the evolution of terrestrial biological cycles
- PMID: 33793005
- DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.341
Regeneration in anamniotes was replaced by regengrow and scarring in amniotes after land colonization and the evolution of terrestrial biological cycles
Abstract
An evolutionary hypothesis explaining failure of regeneration among vertebrates is presented. Regeneration derives from postembryonic processes present during the life cycles of fish and amphibians that include larval and metamorphic phases with broad organ reorganizations. Developmental programs imprinted in their genomes are re-utilized with variations also in adults for regeneration. When vertebrates colonized land adopting the amniotic egg, some genes driving larval changes, and metamorphosis were lost and new genes evolved, further limiting regeneration. These included neural inhibitors for maintaining complex nervous systems, behavior and various levels of intelligence, and adaptive immune cells. The latter, that in anamniotes are executioners of metamorphic reorganization, became intolerant to embryonic-oncofetal-antigens impeding organ regeneration, a process that requires de-differentiation of adult cells and/or expansion of stem cells where these early antigens are formed. The evolution of terrestrial lifecycles produced vertebrates with complex bodies but no longer capable to regenerate their organs, mainly repaired by regengrow. Efforts of regenerative medicine to improve healing in humans should determine the diverse developmental pathways evolved between anamniotes and amniotes before attempting genetic manipulations such as the introduction of "anamniote regenerative genes" in amniotes. This operation may determine alteration in amniote developmental programs leading to teratomes, cancer, or death.
Keywords: evolution; genes; life cycles; regeneration; regengrow; vertebrates.
© 2021 American Association of Anatomists.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Goss RJ. Principles of Regeneration. New York and London: Academic Press; 1969.
-
- Goss RJ. Why mammals don't regenerate: or do they? Neural Inform Process Syst. 1987;2:112-115.
-
- Reichman OJ. Evolution of regenerative capabilities. Amer Natur. 1984;123:752-763.
-
- Tsonis PA. Regeneration in vertebrates. Dev Biol. 2000;221:273-284.
-
- Stocum DL. Regeneration of appendages. In: Stocum DL, ed. Regenerative Biology and Medicine. Amsterdam Intern: Elsevier; 2006.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
