Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 15;127(14):2489-2499.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.33508. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

Duration of cytopenias with concomitant venetoclax and azole antifungals in acute myeloid leukemia

Affiliations

Duration of cytopenias with concomitant venetoclax and azole antifungals in acute myeloid leukemia

Caitlin R Rausch et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Venetoclax (VEN) combined with the hypomethylating agent (HMA) azacitidine improves survival in patients aged ≥75 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). VEN and HMA treatment can result in prolonged and often profound neutropenia, and this warrants antifungal prophylaxis. Azole antifungals inhibit cytochrome P450 3A4, the primary enzyme responsible for VEN metabolism; this results in VEN dose reductions for each concomitant antifungal. Limited clinical data exist on outcomes for patients treated with VEN, an HMA, and various azoles.

Methods: The time to neutrophil recovery (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] > 1000 cells/mm3 ) and platelet (PLT) recovery (PLT count > 100,000 cells/mm3 ) in 64 patients with newly diagnosed AML who achieved a response after course 1 of VEN plus an HMA were evaluated. HMA therapy included azacitidine (75 mg/m2 intravenously/subcutaneously for 7 days) or decitabine (20 mg/m2 intravenously for 5 or 10 days).

Results: Forty-seven patients (73%) received an azole: posaconazole (n = 17; 27%), voriconazole (n = 9; 14%), isavuconazole (n = 20; 31%), or fluconazole (n = 1; 2%). The median time to ANC recovery were similar for patients who did receive an azole (37 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 34-38 days) and patients who did not receive an azole (39 days; 95% CI, 30 days to not estimable; P = .8). The median time to PLT recovery was significantly longer for patients receiving azoles (28 vs 22 days; P = .01). The median times to ANC recovery (35 vs 38 days) and PLT recovery (26 vs 32 days) were similar with posaconazole and voriconazole.

Conclusions: VEN plus an HMA resulted in neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with the latter prolonged in patients receiving concomitant azoles. Concomitant posaconazole or voriconazole and VEN (100 mg) resulted in similar ANC and PLT recovery times, suggesting the safety of these dosage combinations during course 1.

Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia; azole antifungals; invasive fungal infection; prophylaxis; venetoclax.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Time to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery based on concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitor (CYP3A4i) and azole antifungal.
(A) Time to ANC >500 cells/mm3 was not significantly different according to concomitant CYP3A4i (p=0.27) or use of azole antifungal (p=0.2395). (B) Similarly, time to ANC >1000 cells/mm3 was not significantly different according to concomitant CYP3A4i (p=0.623) or use of azole antifungal (p=0.7948)
Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Time to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery based on concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitor (CYP3A4i) and azole antifungal.
(A) Time to ANC >500 cells/mm3 was not significantly different according to concomitant CYP3A4i (p=0.27) or use of azole antifungal (p=0.2395). (B) Similarly, time to ANC >1000 cells/mm3 was not significantly different according to concomitant CYP3A4i (p=0.623) or use of azole antifungal (p=0.7948)
Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Time to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery based on concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitor (CYP3A4i) and azole antifungal.
(A) Time to ANC >500 cells/mm3 was not significantly different according to concomitant CYP3A4i (p=0.27) or use of azole antifungal (p=0.2395). (B) Similarly, time to ANC >1000 cells/mm3 was not significantly different according to concomitant CYP3A4i (p=0.623) or use of azole antifungal (p=0.7948)
Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Time to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery based on concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitor (CYP3A4i) and azole antifungal.
(A) Time to ANC >500 cells/mm3 was not significantly different according to concomitant CYP3A4i (p=0.27) or use of azole antifungal (p=0.2395). (B) Similarly, time to ANC >1000 cells/mm3 was not significantly different according to concomitant CYP3A4i (p=0.623) or use of azole antifungal (p=0.7948)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Time to platelet (PLT) count recovery based on concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitor (CYP3A4i) and azole antifungal.
(A) Time to PLT >50,000 cells/mm3 was significantly different according to concomitant CYP3A4i (p=0.0005), patients receiving a concomitant azole antifungal had a significantly longer time to PLT >50,000 cells/mm3 (median 26 days vs 19 days, p=0.0001). (B) Time to PLT >100,000 cells/mm3 was also significantly different according to concomitant 3A4i (p=0.0263), patients receiving a concomitant azole antifungal had a significantly longer time to PLT >100,000 cells/mm3 (median 28 vs 22 days, p=0.0075)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Time to platelet (PLT) count recovery based on concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitor (CYP3A4i) and azole antifungal.
(A) Time to PLT >50,000 cells/mm3 was significantly different according to concomitant CYP3A4i (p=0.0005), patients receiving a concomitant azole antifungal had a significantly longer time to PLT >50,000 cells/mm3 (median 26 days vs 19 days, p=0.0001). (B) Time to PLT >100,000 cells/mm3 was also significantly different according to concomitant 3A4i (p=0.0263), patients receiving a concomitant azole antifungal had a significantly longer time to PLT >100,000 cells/mm3 (median 28 vs 22 days, p=0.0075)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Time to platelet (PLT) count recovery based on concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitor (CYP3A4i) and azole antifungal.
(A) Time to PLT >50,000 cells/mm3 was significantly different according to concomitant CYP3A4i (p=0.0005), patients receiving a concomitant azole antifungal had a significantly longer time to PLT >50,000 cells/mm3 (median 26 days vs 19 days, p=0.0001). (B) Time to PLT >100,000 cells/mm3 was also significantly different according to concomitant 3A4i (p=0.0263), patients receiving a concomitant azole antifungal had a significantly longer time to PLT >100,000 cells/mm3 (median 28 vs 22 days, p=0.0075)

References

    1. N H, AM N, M K, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2013. Accessed December, 2016.
    1. DiNardo CD, Pratz K, Pullarkat V, et al. Venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in treatment-naive, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. January 2019;133(1):7–17. doi:10.1182/blood-2018-08-868752 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wei AH, Strickland SA, Hou JZ, et al. Venetoclax Combined With Low-Dose Cytarabine for Previously Untreated Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results From a Phase Ib/II Study. J Clin Oncol. May 2019;37(15):1277–1284. doi:10.1200/JCO.18.01600 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wei AH, Montesinos P, Ivanov V, et al. Venetoclax plus LDAC for patients with untreated AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial. Blood. March 2020; doi:10.1182/blood.2020004856 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DiNardo CD, Jonas BA, Pullarkat V, et al. Azacitidine and Venetoclax in Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia. N Engl J Med. August 2020;383(7):617–629. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2012971 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms