Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 31;9(1):78-88.
doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00533. Print 2021 Mar 31.

Levels, Trends, and Inequalities in Using Institutional Delivery Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Stratified Analysis by Facility Type

Md Mehedi Hasan  1   2 , Ricardo J Soares Magalhaes  3   4 , Yaqoot Fatima  5   6 , Saifuddin Ahmed  7   8 , Abdullah A Mamun  5   2
Affiliations

Levels, Trends, and Inequalities in Using Institutional Delivery Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Stratified Analysis by Facility Type

Md Mehedi Hasan et al. Glob Health Sci Pract. .

Abstract

Introduction: To ensure equitable and accessible services and improved utilization of institutional delivery it is important to identify what progress has been achieved, whether there are vulnerable and disadvantaged groups that need specific attention and what are the key factors affecting the utilization of institutional delivery services. In this study, we examined levels, trends, and inequalities in the utilization of institutional delivery services in low- and middle-income countries.

Methods: We used nationally representative cross-sectional data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted during 1990-2018. Bayesian linear regression analysis was performed.

Results: Among 74 countries, the utilization of institutional delivery services ranged from 23.7% in Chad to 100% in Ukraine and Armenia (with >90% in 19 countries and <50% in 13 countries) during the latest DHS rounds. Trend analysis in 63 countries with at least 2 surveys showed that the utilization of institutional delivery services increased in 60 countries during 1990-2018, with the highest increase being in Cambodia (18.3%). During this period, the utilization of institutional delivery services increased in 90.3% of countries among the richest, 95.2% of countries in urban, and 84.1% of countries among secondary+ educated women. The utilization of institutional delivery services was higher among wealthiest, urban, and secondary+ educated women compared to their counterparts. Greater utilization of private facilities for delivery was observed in women from the highest income group and urban communities, whereas highest utilization of public facilities was observed for women from the lowest income group and rural communities.

Conclusions: The utilization of institutional delivery services varied substantially between and within countries over time. Significant disparities in service utilization identified in this study highlight the need for tailored support for women from disadvantaged and vulnerable groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Geographical Variations in the Utilization of Institutional Delivery Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries During Latest Demographic and Health Survey Roundsa a Country and year listed indicate the latest survey year of the respective country. Percentage listed is the country's overall institutional delivery service rate during the latest survey.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Change Rates of Institutional Delivery Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Trends in the Utilization of Institutional Delivery Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Changes of Inequalities in the Utilization of Institutional Delivery Services Between Earliest and Latest Time Points in Low- and Middle-Income Countries by Wealth Quintiles
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Trends in the Utilization of Delivery Services Facilitated by Public and Private Sectors in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Moyer CA, Adanu RM, Engmann CM. The relationship between facility-based delivery and maternal and neonatal mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;122(3):263–265. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.04.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alkema L, Chou D, Hogan D, et al. . Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):462–474. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00838-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Health Organization, World Bank, United Nations. Levels & Trends in Child Mortality: Report 2017. UNICEF; 2017. Accessed January 7, 2021. https://childmortality.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/UN-IGME-Child-Mort...
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2015: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. WHO; 2015. Accessed January 7, 2021. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/monitoring/maternal-...
    1. Ronsmans C, Graham WJ; Lancet Maternal Survival Series steering group. Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet. 2006;368(9542):1189–1200. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69380-X. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources