Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 1;12(1):2018.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22316-8.

Giant gauge factor of Van der Waals material based strain sensors

Affiliations

Giant gauge factor of Van der Waals material based strain sensors

Wenjie Yan et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

There is an emergent demand for high-flexibility, high-sensitivity and low-power strain gauges capable of sensing small deformations and vibrations in extreme conditions. Enhancing the gauge factor remains one of the greatest challenges for strain sensors. This is typically limited to below 300 and set when the sensor is fabricated. We report a strategy to tune and enhance the gauge factor of strain sensors based on Van der Waals materials by tuning the carrier mobility and concentration through an interplay of piezoelectric and photoelectric effects. For a SnS2 sensor we report a gauge factor up to 3933, and the ability to tune it over a large range, from 23 to 3933. Results from SnS2, GaSe, GeSe, monolayer WSe2, and monolayer MoSe2 sensors suggest that this is a universal phenomenon for Van der Waals semiconductors. We also provide proof of concept demonstrations by detecting vibrations caused by sound and capturing body movements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Giant gauge factor (GF) of SnS2 based strain sensors.
a Schematic of the Van der Waals strain sensor devices. b I–V curves under various strain conditions measured in darkness. c The variation of ΔR/R0 as a function of strain for the sensor measured in darkness. d I–V curves under various strain conditions measured with 365 nm light illumination. e The function of ΔR/R0 versus strain of the sensor measured under 365 nm illumination. f GF value of the strain sensor as a function of the power density of 365 nm illumination.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Origin of enhanced GF value by photo illumination.
a Calculated relative change of equivalent potential variation (Δϕ) of the SnS2 based strain sensor with strain (s) with and without external illumination. b Calculated relative change of Δϕ at zero strain (s) as a function of power density of illumination. c Calculated mobility as a function of strain in darkness (red line) and under 365 nm laser illumination (blue line). d Demonstration of the universality of GF enhancement phenomenon by photo illumination for Van der Waals semiconducting materials including SnS2, GaSe, GeSe, monolayer WSe2, and monolayer MoSe2.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Model of measured sensor currents.
Calculated currents (black lines) and measured currents (colored symbols) for a selection of strains for a dark and b 365 nm laser illuminating conditions.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Demonstration of real world application of VdWLM strain sensor.
a The performance of a SnS2 based strain sensor working under illumination when detecting vibrations induced by sound in comparison to signal when working in darkness. b Schematic of strain points produced by motion of a human body used for strain detection by SnS2 based devices. c The measured response produced by smile motion for sensor mounted on cheek, as shown in insert. d Response to wrist bending following positions shown below. e Sensor response to motion of standing and sitting corresponding to the insert image for sensor fixed on knee. f Signals from sensor on knee showing comparative response for slow and rapid walking.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Dynamic strain sensing of SnS2 based strain sensors working under illumination.
a–c The top row shows dynamic strain applied to a sensor at three different frequencies: a 0.11 Hz, b 0.21 Hz and c 0.28 Hz. The second row shows the current response corresponding to each dynamic strain state. df The bottom row shows frequencies calculated by Fourier transforms of I–t curve in figure (ac).

References

    1. Deng S, Sumant AV, Berry V. Strain engineering in two-dimensional nanomaterials beyond graphene. Nano Today. 2018;22:14–35. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2018.07.001. - DOI
    1. Fu XW, et al. Strain dependent resistance in chemical vapor deposition grown graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011;99:213107. doi: 10.1063/1.3663969. - DOI
    1. Feng W, et al. Sensitive electronic-skin strain sensor array based on the patterned two-dimensional α-In2Se3. Chem. Mater. 2016;28:4278–4283. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01073. - DOI
    1. Wu W, et al. Piezoelectricity of single-atomic-layer MoS2 for energy conversion and piezotronics. Nature. 2014;514:470–474. doi: 10.1038/nature13792. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen L, et al. Strain-gated field effect transistor of a MoS2–ZnO 2D–1D hybrid structure. ACS Nano. 2016;10:1546–1551. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b07121. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources