Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 1;11(1):7323.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86890-z.

The change in plasma D-dimer does not help to guide the timing of reimplantation in two stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection

Affiliations

The change in plasma D-dimer does not help to guide the timing of reimplantation in two stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection

Thomas Ackmann et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

D-dimer has been included in the criteria by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society in 2018 as a novel parameter to diagnose prosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, it is unclear how D-dimer levels change in between stages of a two-stage exchange. We prospectively investigated 30 patients who underwent a two-stage exchange using a spacer for PJI. D-Dimer, CRP and IL-6 were collected before first and second stage surgery and the difference (Δ) in between stages was calculated. The levels of plasma D-Dimer did not change from first to second stage surgery (2770 ng/ml (IQR, 1600-3770 ng/ml) versus 2340 ng/ml (IQR, 1270-4100 ng/ml); p = 0.8) while CRP (4.0 mg/dl (IQR, 1.7-5.5 mg/dl) versus 0.6 mg/dl (IQR, 0.5-0.8 mg/dl); p < 0.001) and IL-6 (21 pg/ml (IQR, 10-29 pg/ml) versus 6 pg/ml (4-9 pg/ml); p < 0.001) decreased. The ΔD-dimer between both stages was 300 ng/ml (range: - 2820 to 4280 ng/ml), the median ΔCRP was - 3.4 mg/dl (IQR, - 1.2 to - 4.8 mg/dl) and ΔIL-6 was - 13 pg/ml (IQR, - 4 to - 20 pg/ml). In 15 of 30 cases (50%) the D-dimer level increased between both stages, whereas the level of CRP (93%; 28/30) and IL-6 (96%; 28/29) decreased in most patients. As the level of serum D-dimers varies greatly, lacks a uniform decrease and does not identify persisting infection, surgeons should be cautious when using it at the timing of reimplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
STROBE (Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology) diagram of patients shows the study design.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dombrowski ME, et al. A low percentage of patients satisfy typical indications for single-stage exchange arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic joint infection. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2020;478:1780–1786. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001243. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petis SM, et al. Two-stage exchange protocol for periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty in 245 knees without prior treatment for infection. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2019;101:239–249. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00356. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chalmers BP, et al. Two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty with a specific articulating antibiotic spacer design: reliable periprosthetic joint infection eradication and functional improvement. J. Arthroplasty. 2018;33:3746–3753. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Theil C, et al. Do Positive cultures at second stage re-implantation increase the risk for reinfection in two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection? J. Arthroplasty. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown TS, et al. Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for prosthetic hip re-infection. Bone Jt. J. 2018;100-B:1157–1161. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B9.BJJ-2018-0470.R1. - DOI - PubMed