The evolving role of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
- PMID: 33796237
- PMCID: PMC7970705
- DOI: 10.1177/2040620721989588
The evolving role of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Abstract
Ibrutinib, the first in class of the oral covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, has profoundly changed the treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The phase III RESONATE and RESONATE-2 trials first demonstrated the superiority of ibrutinib over ofatumumab in the relapsed/refractory setting and over chlorambucil in older patients with de novo disease. The phase III ECOG-ACRIN trial extended these results to young, fit patients, demonstrating a significant survival advantage to ibrutinib plus rituximab over fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab. Similarly, the Alliance trial demonstrated the superiority of ibrutinib over bendamustine with rituximab as frontline in elderly patients. Challenges with ibrutinib include toxicity, development of resistance, and need for indefinite therapy. The second generation BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib may cause less off-target toxicity. The ELEVATE TN trial demonstrated the superiority of acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab over chlorambucil and obinutuzumab as frontline therapy for elderly or comorbid patients. Promising early results from the phase II CAPTIVATE and CLARITY trials, which combined ibrutinib with venetoclax, suggest a future role for minimal residual disease (MRD) testing to determine treatment duration. The ongoing phase III GAIA/CLL13, ECOG EA9161, Alliance A041702, CLL17, and [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03836261] trials will assess various combinations of ibrutinib/acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and anti-CD20 antibodies. These trials will answer key questions in the treatment of CLL: should novel agents in CLL be used in combination or sequentially? What is the best frontline agent? Can treatment be safely stopped with BTK inhibitors? Can undetectable MRD be used to determine treatment duration? In this review, we will discuss these and other aspects of the evolving role of BTK inhibition in CLL.
Keywords: BTK inhibitor; acalabrutinib; chronic lymphocytic leukemia; combination therapy; ibrutinib; targeted therapy.
© The Author(s), 2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement: AVD reports consultancy from Abbvie, Beigene, Celgene, Curis, Janssen, Karyopharm, Nurix, Seattle Genetics, Teva Oncology, and TG Therapeutics; research funding from Aptose Biosciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, and Takeda Oncology; and consultancy and research funding from AstraZeneca, Bayer Oncology, Genentech, and Verastem Oncology.
References
-
- Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, et al.. iwCLL guidelines for diagnosis, indications for treatment, response assessment, and supportive management of CLL. Blood 2018; 131: 2745–2760. - PubMed
-
- Eichhorst B, Fink AM, Bahlo J, et al.. First-line chemoimmunotherapy with bendamustine and rituximab versus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab in patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL10): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17: 928–942. - PubMed
-
- Hallek M, Fischer K, Fingerle-Rowson G, et al.. Addition of rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2010; 376: 1164–1174. - PubMed
Publication types
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
