Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 25;4(1):ooab004.
doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab004. eCollection 2021 Jan.

Development and validation of high definition phenotype-based mortality prediction in critical care units

Affiliations

Development and validation of high definition phenotype-based mortality prediction in critical care units

Yao Sun et al. JAMIA Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study are to construct the high definition phenotype (HDP), a novel time-series data structure composed of both primary and derived parameters, using heterogeneous clinical sources and to determine whether different predictive models can utilize the HDP in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to improve neonatal mortality prediction in clinical settings.

Materials and methods: A total of 49 primary data parameters were collected from July 2018 to May 2020 from eight level-III NICUs. From a total of 1546 patients, 757 patients were found to contain sufficient fixed, intermittent, and continuous data to create HDPs. Two different predictive models utilizing the HDP, one a logistic regression model (LRM) and the other a deep learning long-short-term memory (LSTM) model, were constructed to predict neonatal mortality at multiple time points during the patient hospitalization. The results were compared with previous illness severity scores, including SNAPPE, SNAPPE-II, CRIB, and CRIB-II.

Results: A HDP matrix, including 12 221 536 minutes of patient stay in NICU, was constructed. The LRM model and the LSTM model performed better than existing neonatal illness severity scores in predicting mortality using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) metric. An ablation study showed that utilizing continuous parameters alone results in an AUC score of >80% for both LRM and LSTM, but combining fixed, intermittent, and continuous parameters in the HDP results in scores >85%. The probability of mortality predictive score has recall and precision of 0.88 and 0.77 for the LRM and 0.97 and 0.85 for the LSTM.

Conclusions and relevance: The HDP data structure supports multiple analytic techniques, including the statistical LRM approach and the machine learning LSTM approach used in this study. LRM and LSTM predictive models of neonatal mortality utilizing the HDP performed better than existing neonatal illness severity scores. Further research is necessary to create HDP-based clinical decision tools to detect the early onset of neonatal morbidities.

Keywords: high definition phenotype; long–short-term memory; machine learning; mortality prediction; neonatal intensive care unit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Architectural overview of data source, types of data, preparation of HDP data structure and its analysis (F: Fixed, I: Intermittent, C: Continuous parameters).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Data visualization of HDP parameters with respect to time.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Detailed flow chart of data preparation, imputation and analysis, LOS: Length of Stay, Pn: Patient number LR: Logistic Regression, SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique, LSTM: Long Short Term Memory.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Comparison of CRIB (at 12 hours), CRIB-II (at 1 hour), SNAP-II (at 12 hours), SNAPPE-II (at 12 hours), and probability (at 48 hours) for predicting death and discharge.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve of the CRIB, CRIB-II, SNAP-II SNAPPE-II, LRM and LSTM.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
(a) Death case, (b) Discharge case (purple diamond represents the prediction of severe risk by the model, the black circle represents the severity suspected by the doctor), Mn: Anomaly detected by model, Dn: Time of assessment by the doctor.

References

    1. Hall SL, Hynan MT, Phillips R, et al.The neonatal intensive parenting unit: an introduction. J Perinatol 2017; 37 (12): 1259–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolfe HA, Mack EH.. Making care better in the pediatric intensive care unit. Transl Pediatr 2018; 7 (4): 267–74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Howard RS, Kullmann DM, Hirsch NP.. Admission to neurological intensive care: who, when, and why? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74 (90003): 2iii–iii9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Society of Critical Care Medicine. https//www.sccm.orgCommunications Critical-Care-Statistics. Accessed December 3, 2019.
    1. Keir A, McPhee A, Wilkinson D.. Beyond the borderline: outcomes for inborn infants born at ≤500 grams. J Paediatr Child Health 2014; 50 (2): 146–52. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources