Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;38(5):1171-1175.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02178-1. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

More than the oocyte source, egg donors as patients: a national picture of United States egg donors

Affiliations

More than the oocyte source, egg donors as patients: a national picture of United States egg donors

Jennifer F Kawwass et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize national oocyte donation practice patterns from the perspective of individual donors rather than of recipients.

Methods: Retrospective cohort including all donor oocyte retrievals and transfers reported to SARTCORS in 2016 and 2017 in the USA. Primary outcomes include characteristics of oocyte donors and of donor oocyte cycles. Secondary outcomes include overall pregnancy rates, elective single embryo transfer (eSET) rates, and perinatal outcomes among donor oocyte recipient transfers.

Results: During the study period, 49,193 donor oocyte retrievals were performed, of which the largest proportion were in the Western US. For all reported retrievals, there were 17,099 unique donors, each of whom underwent an average of 2.4 retrievals (range 1-22). Average donor age was 26.3 years (range 18-48). On average, 24.6 oocytes (SD 12.4) were retrieved each cycle, ranging from 0 to 102. Among 37,657 donor oocyte recipient transfers, 20,159 (53.5%) involved eSET, and 17,725 (47.1%) resulted in live birth. Miscarriage rates were 17.5%, and good perinatal outcome (GPO), defined as full-term normal birthweight delivery, was more likely among singleton (75.7%) than multiple (23.8%) pregnancies.

Conclusion: The average number of retrievals that donors underwent and oocyte yield mirrored national guidelines; however outliers, exist that may unnecessarily increase donor risk. Additionally, among resultant donor transfers, 46.5% transferred more than one embryo despite national recommendations for eSET. The significantly higher likelihood of GPO among singleton pregnancies points to the need to further increase donor recipient eSET rates.

Keywords: Characteristics; Egg donor; National outcomes; Oocyte donation; eSET.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Not applicable

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Number and proportion of donor oocyte retrievals performed by region of the USA, 2016–2017

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kawwass JF, Monsour M, Crawford S, Kissin DM, Session DR, Kulkarni AD, Jamieson DJ, National ART Surveillance System (NASS) Group Trends and outcomes for donor oocyte cycles in the United States, 2000-2010. JAMA. 2013;310:2426–2434. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yeh JS, Steward RG, Dude AM, Shah AA, Goldfarb JM, Muasher SJ. Pregnancy rates in donor oocyte cycles compared to similar autologous in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 26,457 fresh cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:399–404. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doyle N, Gainty M, Eubanks A, Doyle J, Hayes H, Tucker M, Devine K, DeCherney A, Levy M, Jahandideh S, Hill M. Donor oocyte recipients do not benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy to improve pregnancy outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:2548–2555. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa219. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woodriff M, Sauer MV, Klitzman R. Advocating for longitudinal follow-up of the health and welfare of egg donors. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:662–666. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.037. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woodward JT. Third-party reproduction in the Internet age: the new, patient-centered landscape. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:525–530. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.030. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources