Live birth rate after use of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos at the time of cancer diagnosis in female survivors: a retrospective study of ten years of experience
- PMID: 33797007
- PMCID: PMC8324734
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02168-3
Live birth rate after use of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos at the time of cancer diagnosis in female survivors: a retrospective study of ten years of experience
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of frozen oocytes or embryos cryopreserved after controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) or in vitro maturation (IVM) for female cancer patients who underwent a fertility preservation (FP) prior to gonadotoxic therapy.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study from 2009 to December 2017 was conducted. Among the 667 female cancer patients who underwent oocytes or embryos cryopreservation for FP, 40 (6%) have returned to the fertility clinic between 2011 and 2019 to use their frozen material after being cured. We compared these thaw cycles outcomes according to the techniques used at the time of cryopreservation.
Results: Among the 40 women cancer survivors who used their cryopreserved material, thirty patients have benefited from at least one embryo transfer. Ten patients did not have an embryo transfer since the oocytes did not survive after the thawing process or because no embryo was obtained after fertilization. We related three live births following FP using IVM (two from frozen oocytes and one after embryo cryopreservation). Five live births were obtained when COS was performed at the time of FP (one from frozen oocytes and four after embryo cryopreservation).
Conclusions: Our preliminary results, although they are obtained in a small sample, are encouraging and show that different FP techniques can be used in female cancer patients and lead to live births. IVM is one of the options available that does not delay the start of chemotherapy or if ovarian stimulation using gonadotropins is contraindicated.
Keywords: In vitro maturation; Live birth; Oncofertility preservation; Oocyte cryopreservation; Zygote cryopreservation.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Live birth rate after female fertility preservation for cancer or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the three main techniques; embryo, oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation.Hum Reprod. 2023 Mar 1;38(3):489-502. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac249. Hum Reprod. 2023. PMID: 36421038 Free PMC article.
-
Thirteen years' experience in fertility preservation for cancer patients after in vitro fertilization and in vitro maturation treatments.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Apr;35(4):583-592. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1138-0. Epub 2018 Mar 3. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018. PMID: 29502188 Free PMC article.
-
Fertility preservation after gonadotoxic treatments for cancer and autoimmune diseases.J Ovarian Res. 2023 Aug 10;16(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13048-023-01250-x. J Ovarian Res. 2023. PMID: 37563616 Free PMC article.
-
Live births following fertility preservation using in-vitro maturation of ovarian tissue oocytes.Hum Reprod. 2020 Sep 1;35(9):2026-2036. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa175. Hum Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32829388
-
A comparison of fertility preservation outcomes in patients who froze oocytes, embryos, or ovarian tissue for medically indicated circumstances: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Fertil Steril. 2022 Jun;117(6):1266-1276. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Apr 19. Fertil Steril. 2022. PMID: 35459522
Cited by
-
Live birth rate after female fertility preservation for cancer or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the three main techniques; embryo, oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation.Hum Reprod. 2023 Mar 1;38(3):489-502. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac249. Hum Reprod. 2023. PMID: 36421038 Free PMC article.
-
Disparities in Female Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adult Oncofertility: A Needs Assessment.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 28;13(21):5419. doi: 10.3390/cancers13215419. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34771582 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reproductive outcomes of embryo cryopreservation and transfer at the start-up phase of fertility preservation in Japan.Reprod Med Biol. 2024 Jun 19;23(1):e12581. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12581. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Reprod Med Biol. 2024. PMID: 38899000 Free PMC article.
-
Fertility-sparing surgery: a hopeful strategy for young women with cancer.J Med Life. 2023 Jul;16(7):974-980. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0203. J Med Life. 2023. PMID: 37900072 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In vitro maturation (IVM) of human immature oocytes: is it still relevant?Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023 Nov 22;21(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12958-023-01162-x. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023. PMID: 37993914 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Binder-Foucard F, Belot A, Delafosse P, Remontet L, Woronoff AS, Bossard N. Estimation nationale de l’incidence et de la mortalité par cancer en France entre 1980 et 2012 : étude à partir des registres des cancers du réseau Francim. Partie 1 - Tumeurs solides [Internet]. Institut de veille sanitaire; 2013 [cited 2020 Sep 26]. Available from: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02084700
-
- Reh AE, Lu L, Weinerman R, Grifo J, Krey L, Noyes N. Treatment outcomes and quality-of-life assessment in a university-based fertility preservation program: results of a registry of female cancer patients at 2 years. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:635–641. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9559-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical