Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;20(2):fe3.
doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289.

Fostering Metacognition to Support Student Learning and Performance

Affiliations

Fostering Metacognition to Support Student Learning and Performance

Julie Dangremond Stanton et al. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Metacognition is awareness and control of thinking for learning. Strong metacognitive skills have the power to impact student learning and performance. While metacognition can develop over time with practice, many students struggle to meaningfully engage in metacognitive processes. In an evidence-based teaching guide associated with this paper (https://lse.ascb.org/evidence-based-teaching-guides/student-metacognition), we outline the reasons metacognition is critical for learning and summarize relevant research on this topic. We focus on three main areas in which faculty can foster students' metacognition: supporting student learning strategies (i.e., study skills), encouraging monitoring and control of learning, and promoting social metacognition during group work. We distill insights from key papers into general recommendations for instruction, as well as a special list of four recommendations that instructors can implement in any course. We encourage both instructors and researchers to target metacognition to help students improve their learning and performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Metacognition framework commonly used in biology education research (modified from Schraw and Moshman, 1995). This theoretical framework divides metacognition into two components: metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation. Metacognitive knowledge includes what you know about your own thinking and what you know about strategies for learning. Declarative knowledge involves knowing about yourself as a learner, the demands of the task, and what learning strategies exist. Procedural knowledge involves knowing how to use learning strategies. Conditional knowledge involves knowing when and why to use particular learning strategies. Metacognitive regulation involves the actions you take in order to learn. Planning involves deciding what strategies to use for a future learning task and when you will use them. Monitoring involves assessing your understanding of concepts and the effectiveness of your strategies while learning. Evaluating involves appraising your prior plan and adjusting it for future learning.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
(A) Landing page for the Student Metacognition guide. The landing page provides a map with sections an instructor can click on to learn more about how to support students’ metacognition. (B) Example paper summary showing instructor recommendations. At the end of each summary in our guide, we used italicized text to point out what instructors should know based on the paper’s results.

References

    1. Andrews, T. C., Auerbach, A. J. J., Grant, E. F. (2019). Exploring the relationship between teacher knowledge and active-learning implementation in large college biology courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(4), ar48. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243–260.
    1. Carr, M., Taasoobshirazi, G. (2008). Metacognition in the gifted: Connections to expertise. In Shaughnessy, M. F., Veenman, M., Kleyn-Kennedy, C. (Eds.), Meta-cognition: A recent review of research, theory and perspectives (pp. 109–125). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Sciences Publishers.
    1. Choi, M. M., Kuo, S. W. (2009). Social metacognition in groups: Benefits, difficulties, learning and teaching. In Larson, C. B. (Ed.), Metacognition: New research developments (pp. 117–136). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
    1. Cross, D. R., Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131–142.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources