Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;10(9):2987-2995.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.3757. Epub 2021 Apr 2.

The impact of primary tumor sidedness on survival in early-onset colorectal cancer by stage: A National Veterans Affairs retrospective analysis

Ibrahim Azar  1   2   3 , Nada Al Masalmeh  2 , Saghi Esfandiarifard  4 , Gurjiwan Virk  3 , Wissam Kiwan  2 , Anthony Frank Shields  1   2 , Syed Mehdi  5 , Philip A Philip  1   2
Affiliations

The impact of primary tumor sidedness on survival in early-onset colorectal cancer by stage: A National Veterans Affairs retrospective analysis

Ibrahim Azar et al. Cancer Med. 2021 May.

Abstract

Background: The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is rising. Left-sided colorectal cancer (LCC) is associated with better survival compared to right-sided colon cancer (RCC) in metastatic disease. NCCN guidelines recommend the addition of EGFR inhibitors to KRAS/NRAS WT metastatic CRC originating from the left only. Whether laterality impacts survival in locoregional disease and EOCRC is of interest.

Methods: 65,940 CRC cases from the National VA Cancer Cube Registry (2001-2015) were studied. EOCRC (2096 cases) was defined as CRC diagnosed at <50 years. Using ICD codes, RCC was defined from the cecum to the hepatic flexure (C18.0-C18.3), and LCC from the splenic flexure to the rectum (C18.5-18.7; C19 and C20).

Results: EOCRC is more likely to originate from the left side (66.65% LCC in EOCRC vs. 58.77% in CRC). Overall, LCC has better 5-year Overall Survival (OS) than RCC in stages I (61.67% vs. 58.01%) and III (46.1% vs. 42.1%) and better 1-year OS in stage IV (57.79% vs. 49.49%). Stage II RCC has better 5-year OS than LCC (53.39% vs. 49.28%). In EOCRC, there is no statistically significant difference between LCC and RCC in stages I-III. Stage IV EOCRC patients with LCC and RCC have a 1-year OS of 73.23% and 59.84%, respectively.

Conclusion: In EOCRC, LCC is associated with better OS than RCC only stage IV. In the overall population, LCC is associated with better OS in all stages except stage II. The better prognosis of stage II RCC might be due to the high incidence of mismatch repair deficient tumors in this subpopulation.

Keywords: colon cancer; colorectal cancer; early-onset colorectal cancer; laterality; left-sided colon cancer; primary tumor sidedness; right-sided colon cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Anthony Frank Shields: Consulting: Caris Life Sciences, Lexicon. Speaker's Bureau: Caris Life Sciences. Travel, accommodations, expenses: Caris Life Sciences, Lexicon, Nouscom. Research funding: Alkermes, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Biomedical, Caris Life Sciences, Daiichi, Eisai, Esperas Pharma, Exelixis, Five Prime Therapeutics, H3 Biomedicine, Halozyme, Inc, ImaginAb, Inovio, Incyte, Jiangsu Alphamed, Lexicon, LSK BioPartners, Inc, MSK, Nouscom, Plexxikon. Shanghai HaiHe, Taiho, Torque, Xencor.

Philip Agop Philip: Consulting: Celgene, Ipsen, Merck, TriSalus Life Sciences, Daiichi Sankyo, SynCore, Taiho Pharmaceutical. Speaker's Bureau: Celgene, Bayer, Ipsen, Novartis, Incyte. Travel, accommodations, expenses: Rafael Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, AbbVie. Honoraria: Celgene, Bayer, Ipsen, Merck, AstraZeneca, TriSalus Life Sciences, Blueprint Medicines, SynCore, Array BioPharma. Research funding: Bayer, Incyte, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Merck, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Plexxikon, Immunomedics, Regeneron, Genentech, Tyme, Caris Life Sciences, ASLAN Pharmaceutical, QED Therapeutics, Halozyme, Boston Biomedical, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Lilly, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Merus. Uncompensated relationships: Rafael Pharmaceuticals, Caris MPI.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Left to Right ratio (L:R) by age at diagnosis. The average L:R for CRC and EOCRC is represented by continuous lines
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Left to Right ratio (L:R) by performance status. The average L:R for CRC is represented by continuous lines
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Survival of LCC and RCC by stage in the overall population (A) and patients under the age of 50 (B)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Siegel R, DeSantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(2):104‐117. 10.3322/caac.21220 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:1‐20. 10.3322/caac.21601 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Fedewa SA, Anderson WF, et al. Colorectal cancer incidence patterns in the United States, 1974–2013. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(8):27‐32. 10.1093/jnci/djw322 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolf AMD, Fontham ETH, Church TR, et al. Colorectal cancer screening for average‐risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(4):250‐281. 10.3322/caac.21457 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sharp L, Deady S, Gallagher P, et al. The magnitude and characteristics of the population of cancer survivors: using population based estimates of cancer prevalence to inform service planning for survivorship care. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(1):1‐10. 10.1186/1471-2407-14-767 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms