The Effect of a Single Session of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Balance in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Best Evidence Synthesis
- PMID: 33798002
- DOI: 10.1089/brain.2020.0872
The Effect of a Single Session of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Balance in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Best Evidence Synthesis
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the effects of a single session of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on postural balance. Introduction: The NIBS has been used widely in improving balance. However, the effect of a single session of NIBS on balance in healthy individuals has not been systemically reviewed. Methods: A systematic literature review and best evidence synthesis were conducted, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, to determine the effects of different NIBS techniques on balance function in healthy individuals. The methodological quality of included articles was assessed by the risk of bias, and the Downs and Black tool. Data were analyzed by using the best evidence synthesis. Thirty-five articles were included that used the following NIBS techniques: anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS), cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (c-tDCS), continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on primary motor cortex (M1), supplementary motor area (SMA), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and cerebellum on balance. Results: Strong evidence showed that a-tDCS of M1, SMA improve balance in healthy participants, and the a-tDCS of DLPFC induces improvement only in dual task balance indices. Also, the findings indicate that cerebellar a-tDCS might significantly improve balance, if at least 10 min cerebellar a-tDCS with an intensity of ≥1 mA, over or maximum 1.5 cm below the inion, is used. Strong evidence showed that c-tDCS, cTBS, and rTMS are not effective on the balance. Conclusion: According to the results, the a-tDCS may be a useful technique to improve balance in healthy adults. Impact statement The strong evidence found in this review indicates that single-session, stand-alone application of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on the cerebellum, primary motor cortex (M1), and supplementary motor area can improve balance in healthy individuals. Moreover, strong evidence suggests that cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation has an adverse effect on balance and must be avoided as a technique for the treatment of balance. These results can be used to improve balance in patients with neurological disorders, and healthy older adults with balance dysfunctions.
Keywords: balance; cerebellum; non-invasive brain stimulation; primary motor cortex; transcranial direct current stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Similar articles
-
Does cerebellar non-invasive brain stimulation affect corticospinal excitability in healthy individuals? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.Neurosci Lett. 2019 Jul 27;706:128-139. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.05.025. Epub 2019 May 15. Neurosci Lett. 2019. PMID: 31102706
-
Complex sequential learning is not facilitated by transcranial direct current stimulation over DLPFC or M1.Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Apr;59(8):2046-2058. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16255. Epub 2024 Jan 25. Eur J Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38270331
-
Multi-session anodal tDCS enhances the effects of postural training on balance and postural stability in older adults with high fall risk: Primary motor cortex versus cerebellar stimulation.Brain Stimul. 2018 Nov-Dec;11(6):1239-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.07.044. Epub 2018 Jul 14. Brain Stimul. 2018. PMID: 30017699 Clinical Trial.
-
The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on balance in healthy young and older adults: A systematic review of the literature.Neurophysiol Clin. 2020 Apr;50(2):119-131. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Feb 26. Neurophysiol Clin. 2020. PMID: 32113708
-
Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Reduces Secondary Hyperalgesia Induced by low Frequency Electrical Stimulation in Healthy Volunteers.J Pain. 2022 Feb;23(2):305-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Sep 6. J Pain. 2022. PMID: 34500109 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
High-Definition Trans-Spinal Current Stimulation Improves Balance and Somatosensory Control: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Biomedicines. 2024 Oct 18;12(10):2379. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12102379. Biomedicines. 2024. PMID: 39457691 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of concurrent bilateral anodal tDCS of primary motor cortex and cerebellum on corticospinal excitability: a randomized, double-blind sham-controlled study.Brain Struct Funct. 2022 Sep;227(7):2395-2408. doi: 10.1007/s00429-022-02533-7. Epub 2022 Aug 19. Brain Struct Funct. 2022. PMID: 35984496 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on dual-task performance in different populations: A systematic review.Front Neurosci. 2023 Apr 11;17:1157920. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1157920. eCollection 2023. Front Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37113144 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous