Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 11;13(6):1219.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13061219.

Potential Utility of Pre-Emptive Germline Pharmacogenetics in Breast Cancer

Affiliations

Potential Utility of Pre-Emptive Germline Pharmacogenetics in Breast Cancer

Philip S Bernard et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Patients with breast cancer often receive many drugs to manage the cancer, side effects associated with cancer treatment, and co-morbidities (i.e., polypharmacy). Drug-drug and drug-gene interactions contribute to the risk of adverse events (AEs), which could lead to non-adherence and reduced efficacy. Here we investigated several well-characterized inherited (germline) pharmacogenetic (PGx) targets in 225 patients with breast cancer. All relevant clinical, pharmaceutical, and PGx diplotype data were aggregated into a single unifying informatics platform to enable an exploratory analysis of the cohort and to evaluate pharmacy ordering patterns. Of the drugs recorded, there were 38 for which high levels of evidence for clinical actionability with PGx was available from the US FDA and/or the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC). These data were associated with 10 pharmacogenes: DPYD, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A5, CYP4F2, G6PD, MT-RNR1, SLCO1B1, and VKORC1. All patients were taking at least one of the 38 drugs and had inherited at least one actionable PGx variant that would have informed prescribing decisions if this information had been available pre-emptively. The non-cancer drugs with PGx implications that were common (prescribed to at least one-third of patients) included anti-depressants, anti-infectives, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, and proton pump inhibitors. Based on these results, we conclude that pre-emptive PGx testing may benefit patients with breast cancer by informing drug and dose selection to maximize efficacy and minimize AEs.

Keywords: CYP2D6; breast cancer; genotyping; pharmacogenomics; supportive care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parker J.S., Mullins M., Cheang M.C., Leung S., Voduc D., Vickery T., Davies S., Fauron C., He X., Hu Z., et al. Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009;27:1160–1167. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.1370. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perou C.M., Sorlie T., Eisen M.B., van de Rijn M., Jeffrey S.S., Rees C.A., Pollack J.R., Ross D.T., Johnsen H., Akslen L.A., et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747–752. doi: 10.1038/35021093. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goetz M.P., Knox S.K., Suman V.J., Rae J.M., Safgren S.L., Ames M.M., Visscher D.W., Reynolds C., Couch F.J., Lingle W.L., et al. The impact of cytochrome P450 2D6 metabolism in women receiving adjuvant tamoxifen. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2007;101:113–121. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9428-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dezentje V.O., Guchelaar H.J., Nortier J.W., van de Velde C.J., Gelderblom H. Clinical implications of CYP2D6 genotyping in tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009;15:15–21. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dowsett M., Cuzick J., Ingle J., Coates A., Forbes J., Bliss J., Buyse M., Baum M., Buzdar A., Colleoni M., et al. Meta-Analysis of breast cancer outcomes in adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28:509–518. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1274. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources