The Impact of Antiosteoporotic Drugs on Glucose Metabolism and Fracture Risk in Diabetes: Good or Bad News?
- PMID: 33801212
- PMCID: PMC7957889
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm10050996
The Impact of Antiosteoporotic Drugs on Glucose Metabolism and Fracture Risk in Diabetes: Good or Bad News?
Abstract
Osteoporosis and diabetes mellitus represent global health problems due to their high, and increasing with aging, prevalence in the general population. Osteoporosis can be successfully treated with both antiresorptive and anabolic drugs. While these drugs are clearly effective in reducing the risk of fracture in patients with postmenopausal and male osteoporosis, it is still unclear whether they may have the same efficacy in patients with diabetic osteopathy. Furthermore, as bone-derived cytokines (osteokines) are able to influence glucose metabolism, it is conceivable that antiosteoporotic drugs may have an effect on glycemic control through their modulation of bone turnover that affects the osteokines' release. These aspects are addressed in this narrative review by means of an unrestricted computerized literature search in the PubMed database. Our findings indicate a balance between good and bad news. Active bone therapies and their modulation of bone turnover do not appear to play a clinically significant role in glucose metabolism in humans. Moreover, there are insufficient data to clarify whether there are any differences in the efficacy of antiosteoporotic drugs on fracture incidence between diabetic and nondiabetic patients with osteoporosis. Although more studies are required for stronger recommendations to be issued, bisphosphonates appear to be the first-line drug for treatment of osteoporosis in diabetic patients, while denosumab seems preferable for older patients, particularly for those with impaired renal function, and osteoanabolic agents should be reserved for patients with more severe forms of osteoporosis.
Keywords: bisphosphonates; bone turnover; denosumab; diabetes mellitus; fracture; osteoporosis; teriparatide.
Conflict of interest statement
A.D. Anastasilakis reports lecture fees from Amgen, Bianex, Eli-Lilly, and ITF; E. Tsourdi received research funding from MSD, honoraria for lectures from Amgen, UCB, Shire, Kyowa Kirin, and educational grants from Shire and UCB. G. Tabacco declares no conflicts of interest; N. Napoli reports lecture fees from Amgen and Eli-Lilly. A.M. Naciu reports lecture fees from Amgen; F. Vescini reports lecture fees from Abiogen Pharma, Bruno Farmaceutici, and Gilead Sciences; A. Palermo reports lecture fees from Amgen.
Figures
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
