Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 2;18(5):2432.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052432.

Sport in Town: The Smart Healthy ENV Project, a Pilot Study of Physical Activity with Multiparametric Monitoring

Affiliations

Sport in Town: The Smart Healthy ENV Project, a Pilot Study of Physical Activity with Multiparametric Monitoring

Marco Laurino et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Increasing evidence links meteorological characteristics and air pollution to physiological responses during sports activities in urban areas with different traffic levels.

Objective: The main objective of the Smart Healthy ENV (SHE, "Smart Monitoring Integrated System For A Healthy Urban Environment In Smart Cities") project was to identify the specific responses of a group of volunteers during physical activity, by monitoring their heart rates and collecting breath samples, combined with data on meteorological determinants and pollution substances obtained through fixed sensor nodes placed along city routes and remotely connected to a dedicated data acquisition server.

Methods: Monitoring stations were placed along two urban routes in Pisa, each two km long, with one located within the park beside the Arno river (green route) and the other in a crowded traffic zone (red route). Our sample participants were engaged in sports activities (N = 15, with different levels of ability) and were monitored through wearable sensors. They were first asked to walk back and forth (4 km) and then to run the same route. The experimental sessions were conducted over one day per route. A breath sample was also collected before each test. A questionnaire concerning temperature and fatigue perception was administered for all of the steps of the study over the two days.

Results: The heart rates of the participants were monitored in the baseline condition, during walking, and while running, and were correlated with meteorological and pollutant data and with breath composition. Changes in the heart rates and breath composition were detected during the experimental sessions. These variations were related to the physical activity and to the meteorological conditions and air pollution levels.

Conclusions: The SHE project can be considered a proof-of-concept study aimed at monitoring physiological and environmental variables during physical activity in urban areas, and can be used in future studies to provide useful information to those involved in sports and the broader community.

Keywords: air pollution; breath; heart rate; heat stress; microclimate determinants; multiparametric monitoring; physical activity; sport.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

Infomobility: www.infomobility-italia.com (accessed on 19 January 2021)

Rigel: www.rigel.li.it (accessed on 19 January 2021)

Digitech: www.digitech.com (accessed on 19 January 2021)

Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell’Informazione del CNR (CNR-ISTI): www.isti.cnr.it (accessed on 19 January 2021)

Istituto di Informatica e Telematica del CNR (CNR-IIT): www.iit.cnr.it (accessed on 19 January 2021)

Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica del CNR (CNR-IFC): www.ifc.cnr.it (accessed on 19 January 2021)

Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Agro-alimentari e dell’Ambiente—Università degli Studi di Firenze (DISPAA—CIBIC): www.dispaa.unifi.it (accessed on 19 January 2021)

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fixed sensor nodes along the Arno River green park (green route) and along a crowded traffic zone (red route). Five nodes were positioned on the red route (nodes 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4). Node 0 was also on the green route, where two additional nodes were positioned (nodes 5–6).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Breath sampling system composed of (A) disposable mouthpiece, (B) non-return valve, (C) two-way valve, and (D) Nalophan bag.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Typical examples of EKG monitored during walking (A) and running (B).
Figure 4
Figure 4
On the left is the scatterplot of the significant correlation between data during running for the green route (RR interval and atmospheric pressure), and on the right are the significant correlations between data during running for the red route (RR interval and relative humidity, and RR interval and CO concentration). The scatterplots report the lines of best fit, the Spearman’s correlation coefficients (R), and associated p-values (p-value). The RR interval is expressed in msec, atmospheric pressure in hPa, relative humidity in percentage, and CO in ppm.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Box-plot of the concentration (expressed in pptv) of the traffic-related VOCs measured in the breath samples (n = 15 subjects) collected at the established times before the walk (t0), at its end (t1), and after the run (t2), during the tests on both green and red routes. Note: The box-plot shows the minimum, the 5th and the 25th percentiles, the median, the 75th and 95th percentiles, and the maximum values for each variable investigated. The dot inside the box shows the mean value.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Box-plot of the concentration (expressed in pptv) of metabolic/oxidative stress-associated VOCs measured in the breath sample (n = 15 subjects) collected at the established times before the walk (t0), at its end (t1), and after the run (t2), during the tests on both green and red routes. Note: The box-plot shows the minimum, the 5th, and the 25th percentiles, the median, the 75th, and 95th percentiles, and the maximum values for each variable investigated. The dot inside the box shows the mean value.

References

    1. Sallis J.F. Measuring Physical Activity Environments: A brief history. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2009;36:S86–S92. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Donovan G., Blazevich A.J., Boreham C., Cooper A.R., Crank H., Ekelund U., Fox K.R., Gately P.J., Giles-Corti B., Gill J.M.R., et al. The ABC of Physical Activity for Health: A consensus statement from the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences. J. Sports Sci. 2010;28:573–591. doi: 10.1080/02640411003671212. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thompson Coon J., Boddy K., Stein K., Whear R., Barton J., Depledge M.H. Does Participating in Physical Activity in Outdoor Natural Environments Have a Greater Effect on Physical and Mental Wellbeing than Physical Activity Indoors? A Systematic Review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011;45:1761–1772. doi: 10.1021/es102947t. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fang W.-T., Ng E., Chang M.-C. Physical Outdoor Activity versus Indoor Activity: Their Influence on Environmental Behaviors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2017;14:797. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070797. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mytton O.T., Townsend N., Rutter H., Foster C. Green space and physical activity: An observational study using Health Survey for England data. Health Place. 2012;18:1034–1041. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.06.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources