Overall Complication Rates of DIEP Flap Breast Reconstructions in Germany-A Multi-Center Analysis Based on the DGPRÄC Prospective National Online Registry for Microsurgical Breast Reconstructions
- PMID: 33801419
- PMCID: PMC7958631
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm10051016
Overall Complication Rates of DIEP Flap Breast Reconstructions in Germany-A Multi-Center Analysis Based on the DGPRÄC Prospective National Online Registry for Microsurgical Breast Reconstructions
Abstract
While autologous breast reconstruction has gained momentum over recent years, there is limited data on the structure and quality of care of microsurgical breast reconstruction in Germany. Using the breast reconstruction database established by the German Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (DGPRÄC), the presented study investigated the overall outcomes of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions in Germany. Data of 3926 patients and 4577 DIEP flaps performed by 22 centers were included in this study. Demographics, patient characteristics, perioperative details and postoperative outcomes were accounted for. Centers performing < Ø 40 (low-volume (LV)) vs. ≥ Ø 40 (high-volume (HV)) annual DIEP flaps were analyzed separately. Overall, total and partial flap loss rates were as low as 2.0% and 1.1% respectively, and emergent vascular revision surgery was performed in 4.3% of cases. Revision surgery due to wound complications was conducted in 8.3% of all cases. Mean operative time and length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the HV group (LV: 385.82 min vs. HV: 287.14 min; LV: 9.04 (18.87) days vs. HV: 8.21 (5.04) days; both p < 0.05). The outcome and complication rates deduced from the national registry underline the high standard of microsurgical breast reconstruction on a national level in Germany.
Keywords: breast cancer; breast reconstruction; deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap; microsurgery; plastic surgery; reconstructive surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Use of the superficial inferior epigastric vein in breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap.Front Surg. 2023 May 22;10:1050172. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1050172. eCollection 2023. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 37284559 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.JAMA Surg. 2018 Oct 1;153(10):901-908. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1687. JAMA Surg. 2018. PMID: 29926077 Free PMC article.
-
Morbidity of microsurgical breast reconstruction in patients with comorbid conditions.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar;127(3):1086-1092. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318205f255. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. PMID: 21364411
-
Is Unipedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Obsolete Owing to Superiority of DIEP Flap?Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;80(6S Suppl 6):S418-S420. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001319. Ann Plast Surg. 2018. PMID: 29369109 Review.
-
Dynamic InfraRed Thermography (DIRT) in DIEP-flap breast reconstruction: A review of the literature.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Nov;242:47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Aug 23. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019. PMID: 31563818 Review.
Cited by
-
The Use of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy on the Medial Thigh Donor Site in Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis Flap Breast Reconstruction.J Clin Med. 2022 May 20;11(10):2887. doi: 10.3390/jcm11102887. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35629014 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of 32,019 Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Reconstructions: Insights from the Largest National Readmission Data.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Feb 18;13(2):e6536. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006536. eCollection 2025 Feb. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025. PMID: 39967922 Free PMC article.
-
Advancing DIEP Flap Surgery: Robotic-Assisted Harvest Reduces Pain and Narcotic Use.J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 23;14(15):5204. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155204. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40806826 Free PMC article.
-
Buried Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Outcomes and Technical Considerations.J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 2;13(5):1463. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051463. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38592319 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of Factors Determining Patient Survival after Receiving Free-Flap Reconstruction at a Single Center-A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 21;12(11):2877. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112877. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36428937 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cai A., Suckau J., Arkudas A., Beier J.P., Momeni A., Horch R.E. Autologous Breast Reconstruction with Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous (TRAM) or Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flaps: An Analysis of the 100 Most Cited Articles. Med. Sci. Monit. 2019;25:3520–3536. doi: 10.12659/MSM.914665. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical