Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 27;10(4):525.
doi: 10.3390/antiox10040525.

Dietary Oxidative Distress: A Review of Nutritional Challenges as Models for Poultry, Swine and Fish

Affiliations
Review

Dietary Oxidative Distress: A Review of Nutritional Challenges as Models for Poultry, Swine and Fish

Elodie Bacou et al. Antioxidants (Basel). .

Abstract

The redox system is essential for maintaining cellular homeostasis. When redox homeostasis is disrupted through an increase of reactive oxygen species or a decrease of antioxidants, oxidative distress occurs resulting in multiple tissue and systemic responses and damage. Poultry, swine and fish, raised in commercial conditions, are exposed to different stressors that can affect their productivity. Some dietary stressors can generate oxidative distress and alter the health status and subsequent productive performance of commercial farm animals. For several years, researchers used different dietary stressors to describe the multiple and detrimental effects of oxidative distress in animals. Some of these dietary challenge models, including oxidized fats and oils, exposure to excess heavy metals, soybean meal, protein or amino acids, and feeding diets contaminated with mycotoxins are discussed in this review. A better understanding of the oxidative distress mechanisms associated with dietary stressors allows for improved understanding and evaluation of feed additives as mitigators of oxidative distress.

Keywords: antioxidants; challenge models; diet; fish; gastrointestinal; oxidative distress; pigs; poultry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Halliwell B., Gutteridge J. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2006.
    1. Sies H., Cadenas E. Oxidative stress: Damage to intact cells and organs. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 1985;311:617–631. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1985.0168. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sies H., Jones D.P. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;21:363–383. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0230-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Surai P.F., Kochish I.I., Fisinin V.I., Kidd M.T. Antioxidant Defence Systems and Oxidative Stress in Poultry Biology: An Update. Antioxidants. 2019;8:235. doi: 10.3390/antiox8070235. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lykkesfeldt J., Svendsen O. Oxidants and antioxidants in disease: Oxidative stress in farm animals. Vet. J. 2007;173:502–511. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.06.005. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources