Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 10;13(6):854.
doi: 10.3390/polym13060854.

Synthesis and Characterization of Exopolysaccharide Encapsulated PCL/Gelatin Skin Substitute for Full-Thickness Wound Regeneration

Affiliations

Synthesis and Characterization of Exopolysaccharide Encapsulated PCL/Gelatin Skin Substitute for Full-Thickness Wound Regeneration

Ahmad Hivechi et al. Polymers (Basel). .

Abstract

Loss of skin integrity can lead to serious problems and even death. In this study, for the first time, the effect of exopolysaccharide (EPS) produced by cold-adapted yeast R. mucilaginosa sp. GUMS16 on a full-thickness wound in rats was evaluated. The GUMS16 strain's EPS was precipitated by adding cold ethanol and then lyophilized. Afterward, the EPS with polycaprolactone (PCL) and gelatin was fabricated into nanofibers with two single-needle and double-needle procedures. The rats' full-thickness wounds were treated with nanofibers and Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson's Trichrome staining was done for studying the wound healing in rats. Obtained results from SEM, DLS, FTIR, and TGA showed that EPS has a carbohydrate chemical structure with an average diameter of 40 nm. Cell viability assessments showed that the 2% EPS loaded sample exhibits the highest cell activity. Moreover, in vivo implantation of nanofiber webs on the full-thickness wound on rat models displayed a faster healing rate when EPS was loaded into a nanofiber. These results suggest that the produced EPS can be used for skin tissue engineering applications.

Keywords: exopolysaccharide; nanofiber; tissue regeneration; wound dressing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) FTIR spectrum, (b) TGA (blue)/DSC (black) diagram, and (c) SEM images of produced EPS.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SEM images (right) and fiber diameter distribution (left) of the nanofiber samples (PCL/Gel) with different EPS contents: (a) 0% EPS (b) 1% EPS (c) 2% EPS.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Full (400–4000 cm−1) and (b) magnified spectrum (900–1700 cm−1) of EPS and PCL/Gel nanofibers containing different amounts of EPS. Blue and red dashed lines are the functional groups related to the PCL and gelatin portion of the nanofibers.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Water contact angle images (mean ± standard deviation) of (a) PCL/Gel, (b) PCL/Gel + 1% EPS, and (c) PCL/Gel + 2% EPS nanofiber web.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Results and statistical analysis of the cell viability examination obtained from MTT assay for PCL/Gel nanofibers containing different amounts of EPS (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 6
Figure 6
(a) Macroscopic images of wound area and closure rate (from 0 to 14 days) for the control and treated groups with PCL/Gel, PCL/Gel/1% EPS, and PCL/Gel/2% EPS nanofiber samples. (b) wound closure rate was measured 15 days post-surgery.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Microscopic images of Hematoxylin and Eosin-stained tissues after 7- and 14-days post-surgery.
Figure 8
Figure 8
(a) Microscopic images of Trichrome Masson-stained tissues after 7- and 14-days post-surgery. (b) Statistical analysis according to the integrated optical density (IOD) value and mean density measured by Image-J software. Data are presented as the means ± standard deviation for at least three independent experiments. ** p < 0.01 vs. the control group, *** p < 0.01 vs. the control group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clark R.A.F., Ghosh K., Tonnesen M.G. Tissue Engineering for Cutaneous Wounds. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2007;127:1018–1029. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700715. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yousef H., Miao J.H., Alhajj M., Badri T. Histology, Skin Appendages. StatPearls Internet; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2020. - PubMed
    1. Murphrey M.B., Miao J.H., Zito P.M. Histology, Stratum Corneum. StatPearls Internet; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2020. - PubMed
    1. Xiao-Wu W., Herndon D.N., Spies M., Sanford A.P., Wolf S.E. Effects of Delayed Wound Excision and Grafting in Severely Burned Children. Arch. Surg. 2002;137:1049–1054. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.9.1049. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schofield J.K., Fleming D., Grindlay D., Williams H. Skin Conditions are the Commonest New Reason People Present to General Practitioners in England and Wales. Br. J. Dermatol. 2011;165:1044–1050. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10464.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources