Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 3;10(5):1046.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10051046.

Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study

Affiliations

Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study

Richard Vollenberg et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: The prone position (PP) is increasingly used in mechanically ventilated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. However, studies investigating the influence of the PP are currently lacking in these patients. This is the first study to investigate the influence of the PP on the oxygenation and decarboxylation in COVID-19 patients.

Methods: A prospective bicentric study design was used, and in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, PP was indicated from a partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) ratio of <200. Patients were left prone for 16 h each. Pressure levels, FIO2, were adjusted to ensure a PaO2 greater than 60 mmHg. Blood gas analyses were performed before (baseline 0.5 h), during (1/2/5.5/9.5/13 h), and after being in the PP (1 h), the circulatory/ventilation parameters were continuously monitored, and lung compliance (LC) was roughly calculated. Responders were defined compared to the baseline value (PaO2/FIO2 ratio increase of ≥15%; partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) decrease of ≥2%).

Results: 13 patients were included and 36 PP sessions were conducted. Overall, PaO2/FIO2 increased significantly in the PP (p < 0.001). Most PaO2/FIO2 responders (29/36 PP sessions, 77%) were identified 9.5 h after turning prone (14% slow responders), while most PaCO2 responders (15/36 PP sessions, 42%) were identified 13 h after turning prone. A subgroup of patients (interval intubation to PP ≥3 days) showed less PaO2/FIO2 responders (16% vs. 77%). An increase in PaCO2 and minute ventilation in the PP showed a significant negative correlation (p < 0.001). LC (median before the PP = 38 mL/cm H2O; two patients with LC >80 mL/cm H2O) showed a significant positive correlation with the 28 day survival of patients (p = 0.01).

Conclusion: The PP significantly improves oxygenation in COVID-19 ARDS patients. The data suggest that they also benefit most from an early PP. A decrease in minute ventilation may result in fewer PaCO2 responders. LC may be a predictive outcome parameter in COVID-19 patients.

Trial registration: Retrospectively registered.

Keywords: COVID-19 ARDS; lung compliance; prone position.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood/fractional inspired oxygen concentration (PaO2/FIO2) responder (≥15% improvement in PaO2/FIO2) and PaCO2 responder (≥2% improvement in PaCO2) during the prone (PP) and supine (SP) positions. h, hour.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PaO2/FIO2, PaCO2, lung compliance, minute ventilation, peak inspiratory pressure (PMax), and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) before and during the prone and supine positions.

References

    1. Wu Z., McGoogan J.M. Characteristics of and Important Lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72,314 Cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323:1239–1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chung M., Bernheim A., Mei X., Zhang N., Huang M., Zeng X., Cui J., Xu W., Yang Y., Fayad Z.A., et al. CT Imaging Features of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Radiology. 2020;295:202–207. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200230. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kluge S., Janssens U., Welte T., Weber-Carstens S., Marx G., Karagiannidis C. Empfehlungen zur inten-sivmedizinischen Therapie von Patienten mit COVID-19 (Recommendations for critically ill patients with COVID-19) Med. Klin. Intensivmed. Notf. 2020;115:175–177. doi: 10.1007/s00063-020-00674-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gattinoni L., Busana M., Giosa L., Macrì M.M., Quintel M. Prone Positioning in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019;40:094–100. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685180. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kluge S., Janssens U., Welte T., Weber-Carstens S., Schälte G., Spinner C.D., Malin J.J., Gastmeier P., Langer F., Wepler M., et al. S2k-Leitlinie—Empfehlungen zur stationären Therapie von Patienten mit COVID-19. Pneumology. 2021;75:88–112. doi: 10.1055/a-1334-1925. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources