Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 17;13(6):1353.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13061353.

Immune System Alterations in Multiple Myeloma: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies to Reverse Immunosuppression

Affiliations
Review

Immune System Alterations in Multiple Myeloma: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies to Reverse Immunosuppression

Andrea Díaz-Tejedor et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Immunosuppression is a common feature of multiple myeloma (MM) patients and has been associated with disease evolution from its precursor stages. MM cells promote immunosuppressive effects due to both the secretion of soluble factors, which inhibit the function of immune effector cells, and the recruitment of immunosuppressive populations. Alterations in the expression of surface molecules are also responsible for immunosuppression. In this scenario, immunotherapy, as is the case of immunotherapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), aims to boost the immune system against tumor cells. In fact, mAbs exert part of their cytotoxic effects through different cellular and soluble immune components and, therefore, patients' immunosuppressive status could reduce their efficacy. Here, we will expose the alterations observed in symptomatic MM, as compared to its precursor stages and healthy subjects, in the main immune populations, especially the inhibition of effector cells and the activation of immunosuppressive populations. Additionally, we will revise the mechanisms responsible for all these alterations, including the interplay between MM cells and immune cells and the interactions among immune cells themselves. We will also summarize the main mechanisms of action of the four mAbs approved so far for the treatment of MM. Finally, we will discuss the potential immune-stimulating effects of non-immunotherapeutic drugs, which could enhance the efficacy of immunotherapeutic treatments.

Keywords: immune stimulating drugs; immune system; immunosuppression; monoclonal antibodies; multiple myeloma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.D.-T., M.L.-M., M.G. and T.P. declare no conflict of interest. N.P.: Honoraria: Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, The Binding Site; consulting or advisory role: Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda; speakers’ bureau: Celgene; research funding: Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Takeda; travel, accommodations, expenses: Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda. R.G.-S.: Honoraria: Amgen, Astellas, Beigene, BMS, Janssen, Takeda; Speakers bureau/scientific advisory board: Takeda. M.-V.M.: Honoraria: Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, GSK, Abbvie, Adaptive, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Gennentech, Oncopeptides, Sanofi.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the main immune system alterations described in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Briefly, T and natural killer (NK) cells are inhibited through both soluble factors and cell-to-cell contacts with either myeloma cells or other immune cell populations. Grey arrows refer to receptor-ligand union, green arrows stand for activation whereas red bar-headed lines indicate inhibition. Regarding soluble factors, squares refer to tryptophan, pentagons to kynurenine, spiked circles to adenosine (ADO) and triangles to arginine. TAM: tumor associated macrophages; Treg: regulatory T lymphocytes; MDSC: myeloid derived suppressor cells; IDO: indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Principal mechanisms of action of the three naked mAbs (elotuzumab, daratumumab and isatuximab) and the ADC (belantamab mafodotin) approved for the treatment of MM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rajkumar S.V., Dimopoulos M.A., Palumbo A., Blade J., Merlini G., Mateos M.-V., Kumar S., Hillengass J., Kastritis E., Richardson P., et al. International Myeloma Working Group Updated Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e538–e548. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mogollón P., Díaz-Tejedor A., Algarín E.M., Paíno T., Garayoa M., Ocio E.M. Biological Background of Resistance to Current Standards of Care in Multiple Myeloma. Cells. 2019;8:1432. doi: 10.3390/cells8111432. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garcia-Gomez A., Sanchez-Guijo F., del Cañizo M.C., San Miguel J.F., Garayoa M. Multiple Myeloma Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Contribution to Myeloma Bone Disease and Therapeutics. World J. Stem Cells. 2014;6:322–343. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v6.i3.322. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holstein S.A., McCarthy P.L. Immunomodulatory Drugs in Multiple Myeloma: Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Experience. Drugs. 2017;77:505–520. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0689-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Binsfeld M., Fostier K., Muller J., Baron F., Schots R., Beguin Y., Heusschen R., Caers J. Cellular Immunotherapy in Multiple Myeloma: Lessons from Preclinical Models. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014;1846:392–404. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.08.001. - DOI - PubMed