Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 17;26(6):1676.
doi: 10.3390/molecules26061676.

Crocetin Mitigates Irradiation Injury in an In Vitro Model of the Pubertal Testis: Focus on Biological Effects and Molecular Mechanisms

Affiliations

Crocetin Mitigates Irradiation Injury in an In Vitro Model of the Pubertal Testis: Focus on Biological Effects and Molecular Mechanisms

Giulia Rossi et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

Infertility is a potential side effect of radiotherapy and significantly affects the quality of life for adolescent cancer survivors. Very few studies have addressed in pubertal models the mechanistic events that could be targeted to provide protection from gonadotoxicity and data on potential radioprotective treatments in this peculiar period of life are elusive. In this study, we utilized an in vitro model of the mouse pubertal testis to investigate the efficacy of crocetin to counteract ionizing radiation (IR)-induced injury and potential underlying mechanisms. Present experiments provide evidence that exposure of testis fragments from pubertal mice to 2 Gy X-rays induced extensive structural and cellular damage associated with overexpression of PARP1, PCNA, SOD2 and HuR and decreased levels of SIRT1 and catalase. A twenty-four hr exposure to 50 μM crocetin pre- and post-IR significantly reduced testis injury and modulated the response to DNA damage and oxidative stress. Nevertheless, crocetin treatment did not counteract the radiation-induced changes in the expression of SIRT1, p62 and LC3II. These results increase the knowledge of mechanisms underlying radiation damage in pubertal testis and establish the use of crocetin as a fertoprotective agent against IR deleterious effects in pubertal period.

Keywords: HuR; SIRT1; X-rays; autophagy; crocetin; fertility preservation; oxidative stress; pubertal testis; radiotherapy; saffron.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative images showing H&E stained testis sections from control (a,a’), irradiated (b,b’) and crocetin + irradiated group (c,c’). Histological features of irradiated testes show a significant increase in diameter and cross-sectional area of seminiferous tubules, a decrease of seminiferous epithelium height compared with the control group. Crocetin pretreatment significantly protects irradiated testes from X-rays injury. Seminiferous epithelium height is delimited by black double arrow. Mature spermatozoa located into the lumen of tubules are indicated with asterisk.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Western blot analysis of PARP1 and PCNA protein levels. (b) Representative images of immunoreactive bands. Data are presented as means ± SEM of densitometric analysis of immunoreactive bands normalized to internal reference protein (GAPDH). One-way ANOVA p < 0.05; a,b p < 0.05, Holm–Sidak post hoc multiple comparison.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Western blot analysis of SIRT1, HuR, CAT, and SOD2 protein levels. (b) Representative images of immunoreactive bands. Data are presented as means ± SEM of densitometric analysis of immunoreactive bands normalized to internal reference protein (GAPDH). One-way ANOVA p < 0.05; a,b p < 0.05, Holm–Sidak post hoc multiple comparison.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Western blot analysis of p62 and LC3-II. (b) Representative images of immunoreactive bands. Data are presented as means ± SEM of densitometric analysis of immunoreactive bands normalized to internal reference protein (GAPDH). One-way ANOVA p < 0.05; a,b p < 0.05, Holm–Sidak post hoc multiple comparison.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Valli H., Phillips B.T., Shetty G., Byrne J.A., Clark A.T., Meistrich M.L., Orwig K.E. Germline stem cells: Toward the regeneration of spermatogenesis. Fertil. Steril. 2014;101:3–13. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.052. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ward E., DeSantis C., Robbins A., Kohler B., Jemal A. Childhood and adolescent cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2014;64:83–103. doi: 10.3322/caac.21219. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jeruss J.S., Woodruff T.K. Preservation of fertility in patients with cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360:902–911. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0801454. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Osterberg E.C., Ramasamy R., Masson P., Brannigan R.E. Current practices in fertility preservation in male cancer patients. Urol. Ann. 2014;6:13–20. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.127008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Müller J., Skakkebaek N.E. Quantification of germ cells and seminiferous tubules by stereological examination of testicles from 50 boys who suffered from sudden death. Int. J. Androl. 1983;6:143–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1983.tb00333.x. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources