Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 9;18(5):2786.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052786.

Development of a Patient-Oriented Intervention to Support Patient-Provider Conversations about Unnecessary Lower Back Pain Imaging

Maryam Madani Larijani  1 , Cindy Dumba  2 , Heather Thiessen  3 , Angie Palen  4 , Tracey Carr  1 , Jason R Vanstone  5 , Daryl R Fourney  6 , Collin Hartness  5 , Robert Parker  5 , Gary Groot  1
Affiliations

Development of a Patient-Oriented Intervention to Support Patient-Provider Conversations about Unnecessary Lower Back Pain Imaging

Maryam Madani Larijani et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: despite the efforts of multiple stakeholders to promote appropriate care throughout the healthcare system, studies show that two out of three lower back pain (LBP) patients expect to receive imaging. We used the Choosing Wisely Canada patient-oriented framework, prioritizing patient engagement, to develop an intervention that addresses lower back pain imaging overuse.

Methods: to develop this intervention, we collaborated with a multidisciplinary advisory team, including two patient partners with lower back pain, researchers, clinicians, healthcare administrators, and the Choosing Wisely Canada lead for Saskatchewan. For this qualitative study, data were collected through two advisory team meetings, two individual interviews with lower back pain patient partners, and three focus groups with lower back pain patient participants. A lower back pain prescription pad was developed as an outcome of these consultations.

Results: participants reported a lack of interactive and informative communication was a significant barrier to receiving appropriate care. The most cited content information for inclusion in this intervention was treatments known to work, including physical activity, useful equipment, and reliable sources of educational material. Participants also suggested it was important that benefits and risks of imaging were explained on the pad. Three key themes derived from the data were also used to guide development of the intervention: (a) the role of imaging in LBP diagnosis; (b) the impact of the patient-physician relationship on LBP diagnosis and treatment; and (c) the lack of patient awareness of Choosing Wisely Canada and their recommendations.

Conclusions: the lower back pain patient-developed prescription pad may help patients and clinicians engage in informed conversations and shared decision making that could support reduce unnecessary lower back pain imaging.

Keywords: Choosing Wisely Canada; diagnostic imaging; lower back pain; patient education; patient engagement; physician-patient relation; primary healthcare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Development process for the LBP prescription pad. 1 Choosing Wisely Canada.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The patient-developed LBP prescription pad.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information Emergency Department Visits in 2014–2015: Information Sheet. [(accessed on 26 November 2020)]; Available online: https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/NACRS_ED_QuickStats_Infosheet_2014-....
    1. Edwards J., Hayden J., Asbridge M., Magee K. The prevalence of low back pain in the emergency department: A descriptive study set in the Charles, V. Keating Emergency and Trauma Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2018;19:306. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2237-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Busse J., Alexander P.E., Abdul-Razzak A., Riva J.J., John Dufton D., Zhang M., Faulhaber M., Couban C.R., Guyatt M.G., Rampersaud Y.R., et al. Appropriateness of Spinal Imaging Use in Canada. [(accessed on 5 November 2020)];2013 Available online: http://nationalpaincentre.mcmaster.ca/documents/AppropriatenessofSpinalI....
    1. De González A.B. Projected Cancer Risks from Computed Tomographic Scans Performed in the United States in 2007. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009;169:2071–2077. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lurie J.D., Birkmeyer N.J., Weinstein J.N. Rates of Advanced Spinal Imaging and Spine Surgery. Spine. 2003;28:616–620. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000049927.37696.DC. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources