Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 18;13(6):1383.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13061383.

Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC): An Intralesional Cancer Immunotherapy for Advanced Melanoma

Affiliations
Review

Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC): An Intralesional Cancer Immunotherapy for Advanced Melanoma

Pier Francesco Ferrucci et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Direct intralesional injection of specific or even generic agents, has been proposed over the years as cancer immunotherapy, in order to treat cutaneous or subcutaneous metastasis. Such treatments usually induce an effective control of disease in injected lesions, but only occasionally were able to demonstrate a systemic abscopal effect on distant metastases. The usual availability of tissue for basic and translational research is a plus in utilizing this approach, which has been used in primis for the treatment of locally advanced melanoma. Melanoma is an immunogenic tumor that could often spread superficially causing in-transit metastasis and involving draining lymph nodes, being an interesting model to study new drugs with different modality of administration from normal available routes. Talimogene laherperepvec (T-VEC) is an injectable modified oncolytic herpes virus being developed for intratumoral injection, that produces granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and enhances local and systemic antitumor immune responses. After infection, selected viral replication happens in tumor cells leading to tumor cell lysis and activating a specific T-cell driven immune response. For this reason, a probable synergistic effect with immune checkpoints inhibition have been described. Pre-clinical studies in melanoma confirmed that T-VEC preferentially infects melanoma cells and exerts its antitumor activity through directly mediating cell death and by augmenting local and even distant immune responses. T-VEC has been assessed in monotherapy in Phase II and III clinical trials demonstrating a tolerable side-effect profile, a promising efficacy in both injected and uninjected lesions, but a mild effect at a systemic level. In fact, despite improved local disease control and a trend toward superior overall survival in respect to the comparator GM-CSF (which was injected subcutaneously daily for two weeks), responses as a single agent therapy have been uncommon in patients with visceral metastases. For this reason, T-VEC is currently being evaluated in combinations with other immune checkpoint inhibitors such as ipilimumab and pembrolizumab, with interesting confirmation of activity even systemically.

Keywords: GM-CSF; T-VEC; intratumoral immunotherapy; melanoma; oncolytic virus; talimogene laherparepvec.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

P.F.F. and E.C. are consultant/advisory board member for Bristol-Meyers Squibb, MSD Oncology, Roche, Novartis, Pierre Fabre. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
T-VEC proposed mechanism of action. TDA tumor-derived antigen. GM-CSF: Granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor. [33]. Image courtesy of Amgen Inc. Open access: used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Accessed on 22 January 2021.
Figure 2
Figure 2
62 years old patient presenting with 2 huge malleolar lesions and lymphnodal metastases from acral melanoma. She was treated with T-VEC over a period of 2 years, achieving a complete remission, which is lasting after 2 years from the end of treatment. (A). At diagnosis; (B). after 6 months; (C). After 12 months.

References

    1. Siegel R., Ma J., Zou Z., Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2014;64:9–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21208. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gershenwald J.E., Scolyer R.A., Hess K.R., Sondak V.K., Long G.V., Ross M.I., Lazar A.J., Faries M.B., Kirkwood J.M., McArthur G.A., et al. Melanoma staging: Evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2017;67:472–492. doi: 10.3322/caac.21409. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weber J., Mandalà M., del Vecchio M., Gogas H., Arance A.M., Cowey C.L., Dalle S., Schenker M., Chiarion-Sileni V., Marquez-Rodas I., et al. Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in Resected Stage III or IV Melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:1824–1835. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Long G.V., Hauschild A., Santinami M. Adjuvant Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Stage III BRAF-Mutated Melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:1813–18235. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708539. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eggermont A.M., Blank C.U., Mandalà M., Long G.V., Atkinson V., Dalle S., Haydon A., Lichinitser M., Khattak A., Carlino M.S., et al. Adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus Placebo in Resected Stage III Melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;378:1789–1801. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802357. - DOI - PubMed