Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 24;11(4):580.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040580.

Electromyographic Patterns of Masticatory Muscles in Relation to Active Myofascial Trigger Points of the Upper Trapezius and Temporomandibular Disorders

Affiliations

Electromyographic Patterns of Masticatory Muscles in Relation to Active Myofascial Trigger Points of the Upper Trapezius and Temporomandibular Disorders

Grzegorz Zieliński et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

The presented study aimed to analyze and compare the electromyographic patterns of masticatory muscles in subjects with active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) within upper trapezius, patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and healthy adults. Based on the diagnostic criteria of MTrPs according to Travell & Simons and the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders, 167 people were qualified for the study. Subjects were divided into 3 groups: with active MTrPs in the upper trapezius, with diagnosed temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and healthy adults. Measurements of the bioelectric activity of the temporalis anterior (TA) and masseter muscle (MM) were carried out using the BioEMG III ™. Based on statistical analysis, significantly lower values of TA resting activity were observed among controls in comparison to MTrPs (1.49 μV vs. 2.81 μV, p = 0.00) and TMDs (1.49 μV vs. 2.97 μV, p = 0.01). The POC index values at rest differed significantly between MTrPs and TMDs (86.61% vs. 105%, p = 0.04). Controls presented different electromyographic patterns within AcI in comparison to both MTrPs (4.90 vs. -15.51, p = 0.00) and TMDs (4.90 vs. -16.49, p = 0.00). During clenching, the difference between MTrPs and TMDs was observed within MVC TA (91.82% vs. 116.98%, p = 0.02). TMDs showed differences within AcI in comparison to both MTrPs group (-42.52 vs. 20.42, p = 0.01) and controls (-42.52 vs. 3.07, p = 0.00). During maximum mouth opening, differences between MTrPs and TMDs were observed within the bioelectric activity of masseter muscle (16.45 μV vs. 10.73 μV, p = 0.01), AsI MM (0.67 vs. 11.12, p = 0.04) and AcI (13.04 vs. -3.89, p = 0.01). Both the presence of MTrPs in the upper trapezius and TMDs are related to changes in electromyographic patterns of masticatory muscles.

Keywords: electromyography; masseter muscle; myofascial pain; myofascial trigger points; temporalis anterior; trapezius.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Electrodes placement during the electromyographic examination.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bron C., Dommerholt J.D. Etiology of Myofascial Trigger Points. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2012;16:439–444. doi: 10.1007/s11916-012-0289-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simons D.G., Travel J.G., Simons L.S., Cummings B.D. Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point Manual. 2nd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 1998.
    1. Gerwin R. Myofascial Pain Syndrome: Here We Are, Where Must We Go? J. Musculoskelet. Pain. 2010;18:329–347. doi: 10.3109/10582452.2010.502636. - DOI
    1. Zhuang X., Tan S., Huang Q. Understanding of Myofascial Trigger Points. Chin. Med. J. 2014;127:4271–4277. - PubMed
    1. Simons D.G. Review of Enigmatic MTrPs as a Common Cause of Enigmatic Musculoskeletal Pain and Dysfunction. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2004;14:95–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.018. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources