Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 29;12(4):501.
doi: 10.3390/genes12040501.

Chances and Challenges of New Genetic Screening Technologies (NIPT) in Prenatal Medicine from a Clinical Perspective: A Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

Chances and Challenges of New Genetic Screening Technologies (NIPT) in Prenatal Medicine from a Clinical Perspective: A Narrative Review

Ivonne Bedei et al. Genes (Basel). .

Abstract

In 1959, 63 years after the death of John Langdon Down, Jérôme Lejeune discovered trisomy 21 as the genetic reason for Down syndrome. Screening for Down syndrome has been applied since the 1960s by using maternal age as the risk parameter. Since then, several advances have been made. First trimester screening, combining maternal age, maternal serum parameters and ultrasound findings, emerged in the 1990s with a detection rate (DR) of around 90-95% and a false positive rate (FPR) of around 5%, also looking for trisomy 13 and 18. With the development of high-resolution ultrasound, around 50% of fetal anomalies are now detected in the first trimester. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomy 21, 13 and 18 is a highly efficient screening method and has been applied as a first-line or a contingent screening approach all over the world since 2012, in some countries without a systematic screening program. Concomitant with the rise in technology, the possibility of screening for other genetic conditions by analysis of cfDNA, such as sex chromosome anomalies (SCAs), rare autosomal anomalies (RATs) and microdeletions and duplications, is offered by different providers to an often not preselected population of pregnant women. Most of the research in the field is done by commercial providers, and some of the tests are on the market without validated data on test performance. This raises difficulties in the counseling process and makes it nearly impossible to obtain informed consent. In parallel with the advent of new screening technologies, an expansion of diagnostic methods has begun to be applied after invasive procedures. The karyotype has been the gold standard for decades. Chromosomal microarrays (CMAs) able to detect deletions and duplications on a submicroscopic level have replaced the conventional karyotyping in many countries. Sequencing methods such as whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) tremendously amplify the diagnostic yield in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies.

Keywords: chromosomal microarray (CMA); copy number variant (CNV); non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD); non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT); rare autosomal trisomy (RAT); sex chromosome anomaly (SCA); whole exome sequencing (WES); whole genome sequencing (WGS).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Grande M., Arigita M., Borobio V., Jimenez J.M., Fernandez S., Borrell A. First-trimester detection of structural abnormalities and the role of aneuploidy markers. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2012;39:157–163. doi: 10.1002/uog.10070. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brandt J.S., Cruz Ithier M.A., Rosen T., Ashkinadze E. Advanced paternal age, infertility, and reproductive risks: A review of the literature. Prenat. Diagn. 2019;39:81–87. doi: 10.1002/pd.5402. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kagan K.O., Maier V., Sonek J., Abele H., Lüthgens K., Schmid M., Wagner P., Hoopmann M. False-Positive Rate in First-Trimester Screening Based on Ultrasound and Cell-Free DNA versus First-Trimester Combined Screening with Additional Ultrasound Markers. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2018;45:317–324. doi: 10.1159/000489121. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Norton M.E., Jacobsson B., Swamy G.K., Laurent L.C., Ranzini A.C., Brar H., Tomlinson M.W., Pereira L., Spitz J.L., Hollemon D., et al. Cell-free DNA Analysis for Noninvasive Examination of Trisomy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;372:1589–1597. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1407349. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pescia G., Guex N., Iseli C., Brennan L., Osteras M., Xenarios I., Farinelli L., Conrad B. Cell-free DNA testing of an extended range of chromoso-mal anomalies: Clinical experience with 6388 consecutive cases. Genet. Med. 2017;19:169–175. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.72. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources