Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 13;11(3):202.
doi: 10.3390/jpm11030202.

Genomic Sequencing Results Disclosure in Diverse and Medically Underserved Populations: Themes, Challenges, and Strategies from the CSER Consortium

Affiliations

Genomic Sequencing Results Disclosure in Diverse and Medically Underserved Populations: Themes, Challenges, and Strategies from the CSER Consortium

Sabrina A Suckiel et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

Genomic sequencing results need to be effectively communicated across all populations and practice settings. Projects in the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium enroll diverse racial/ethnic and medically underserved participants across various clinical contexts. This article explores a set of CSER results disclosure cases to expand the evidence base on experiences returning genomic results. Case details were collected using a structured set of questions. We identified common themes in the case set, and assessed challenges and strategies in achieving six relevant results disclosure objectives. CSER-affiliated patient/community stakeholder impressions of the findings were solicited via video conference calls. Seventeen cases across six CSER projects were included. Case themes sorted into four categories: (1) factors influencing participant understanding, (2) participant emotional response, (3) disease burden, and (4) logistical challenges. Challenges meeting results disclosure objectives included a lack of dialogue, health literacy level, unexpected findings, and complex concepts. Strategies were consistent with traditional genetic counseling practice, but also highlighted approaches being evaluated in CSER projects. Patient/community stakeholders supported the identified themes and provided additional suggestions to improve patient understanding and engagement. These experiences add valuable insights into adapting genomic results disclosure practices to best serve all patient populations.

Keywords: exome sequencing; genetic counseling; genome sequencing; genomic sequencing; return of results; underrepresented populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Project workflow. This project occurred in five stages: (1) compiling a case set, (2) identifying themes across the case set, (3) defining results disclosure objectives that were related to the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) projects, (4) identifying challenges and strategies in achieving the results disclosure objectives, and 5) soliciting feedback from CSER patient/community stakeholders.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Categorized themes are highlighted in the case set.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kullo I.J., Haddad R., Prows C.A., Holm I., Sanderson S.C., Garrison N.A., Sharp R.R., Smith M.E., Kuivaniemi H., Bottinger E.P., et al. Return of results in the genomic medicine projects of the eMERGE network. Front. Genet. 2014;5:50. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00050. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berg J.S., Amendola L.M., Eng C., Van Allen E., Gray S.W., Wagle N., Rehm H.L., DeChene E.T., Dulik M.C., Hisama F.M., et al. Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. Genet. Med. Off. J. Am. Coll. Med. Genet. 2013;15:860–867. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.133. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wynn J., Lewis K., Amendola L.M., Bernhardt B.A., Biswas S., Joshi M., McMullen C., Scollon S. Clinical providers’ experiences with returning results from genomic sequencing: An interview study. BMC Med. Genomics. 2018;11:45. doi: 10.1186/s12920-018-0360-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schwartz M.L.B., McCormick C.Z., Lazzeri A.L., Lindbuchler D.M., Hallquist M.L.G., Manickam K., Buchanan A.H., Rahm A.K., Giovanni M.A., Frisbie L., et al. A Model for Genome-First Care: Returning Secondary Genomic Findings to Participants and Their Healthcare Providers in a Large Research Cohort. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2018;103:328–337. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.07.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amendola L.M., Lautenbach D., Scollon S., Bernhardt B., Biswas S., East K., Everett J., Gilmore M.J., Himes P., Raymond V.M., et al. Illustrative case studies in the return of exome and genome sequencing results. Personal. Med. 2015;12:283–295. doi: 10.2217/pme.14.89. - DOI - PMC - PubMed