Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 4;18(5):2555.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052555.

Sex Education in the Spotlight: What Is Working? Systematic Review

Affiliations

Sex Education in the Spotlight: What Is Working? Systematic Review

María Lameiras-Fernández et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Adolescence, a period of physical, social, cognitive and emotional development, represents a target population for sexual health promotion and education when it comes to achieving the 2030 Agenda goals for sustainable and equitable societies. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of what is known about the dissemination and effectiveness of sex education programs and thereby to inform better public policy making in this area. Methodology: We carried out a systematic review based on international scientific literature, in which only peer-reviewed papers were included. To identify reviews, we carried out an electronic search of the Cochrane Database Reviews, ERIC, Web of Science, PubMed, Medline, Scopus and PsycINFO. This paper provides a narrative review of reviews of the literature from 2015 to 2020. Results: 20 reviews met the inclusion criteria (10 in school settings, 9 using digital platforms and 1 blended learning program): they focused mainly on reducing risk behaviors (e.g., VIH/STIs and unwanted pregnancies), whilst obviating themes such as desire and pleasure, which were not included in outcome evaluations. The reviews with the lowest risk of bias are those carried out in school settings and are the ones that most question the effectiveness of sex education programs. Whilst the reviews of digital platforms and blended learning show greater effectiveness in terms of promoting sexual and reproductive health in adolescents (ASRH), they nevertheless also include greater risks of bias. Conclusion: A more rigorous assessment of the effectiveness of sexual education programs is necessary, especially regarding the opportunities offered by new technologies, which may lead to more cost-effective interventions than with in-person programs. Moreover, blended learning programs offer a promising way forward, as they combine the best of face-to-face and digital interventions, and may provide an excellent tool in the new context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords: adolescents; blended learning; digital platforms; review of reviews; school setting; sexual and reproductive health; sexual education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure A1
Figure A1
Flow diagram Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis, PRISMA).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO The Health of Youth. Geneva 1989. [(accessed on 12 November 2020)]; Available online: https://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/pdfs/9241591269_....
    1. Anderson R.M. Positive sexuality and its impact on overall well-being. Bundesgesundheitsbl. 2013;56:208–214. doi: 10.1007/s00103-012-1607-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO Defining Sexual Health Report of a Technical Consultation on Sexual Health, Geneva 2006. [(accessed on 15 November 2020)]; Available online: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/gender_rights/defining_sex....
    1. UN Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible. [(accessed on 9 April 2020)];2015 Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/2015/09/la-asamblea-general...
    1. Blanc M.A., Rojas T.A. Condom use, number of partners and sexual debut in young people in penile-vaginal intercourse, oral sex and anal sex. Rev. Int. 2018;16:8. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources