Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 31;10(7):1400.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10071400.

Reproductive Chances of Men with Azoospermia Due to Spermatogenic Dysfunction

Affiliations
Review

Reproductive Chances of Men with Azoospermia Due to Spermatogenic Dysfunction

Caroline Kang et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), or lack of sperm in the ejaculate due to spermatogenic dysfunction, is the most severe form of infertility. Men with this form of infertility should be evaluated prior to treatment, as there are various underlying etiologies for NOA. While a significant proportion of NOA men have idiopathic spermatogenic dysfunction, known etiologies including genetic disorders, hormonal anomalies, structural abnormalities, chemotherapy or radiation treatment, infection and inflammation may substantively affect the prognosis for successful treatment. Despite the underlying etiology for NOA, most of these infertile men are candidates for surgical sperm retrieval and subsequent use in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). In this review, we describe common etiologies of NOA and clinical outcomes following surgical sperm retrieval and ICSI.

Keywords: infertility; intracytoplasmic sperm injection; non-obstructive azoospermia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

    1. Leifke E., Nieschlag E. Male infertility treatment in the light of evidence-based medicine. Andrologia. 1996;28:23–30. - PubMed
    1. Bernie A.M., Mata D.A., Ramasamy R., Schlegel P.N. Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive azoospermia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil. Steril. 2015;104:1099–1103.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1136. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Corona G., Minhas S., Giwercman A., Bettocchi C., Dinkelman-Smit M., Dohle G., Fusco F., Kadioglou A., Kliesch S., Kopa Z., et al. Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2019;25:733–757. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schlegel P.N. Testicular sperm extraction: Microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum. Reprod. 1999;14:131–135. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.1.131. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Esteves S.C. Clinical management of infertile men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Asian J. Androl. 2015;17:459–470. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.148719. - DOI - PMC - PubMed