Evaluation of a New Spike (S)-Protein-Based Commercial Immunoassay for the Detection of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG
- PMID: 33807490
- PMCID: PMC8067155
- DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9040733
Evaluation of a New Spike (S)-Protein-Based Commercial Immunoassay for the Detection of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG
Abstract
Background: The investigation of the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 represents a key aspect in facing the COVID-19 pandemic. In the present study, we compared the new Immundiagnostik IDK® anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG assay with four widely-used commercial serological assays for the detection of antibodies targeting S (spike) and NC (nucleocapsid) proteins. Methods: Serum samples were taken from an unbiased group of convalescent patients and from a negative control group. Sample were simultaneously analyzed by the new Immundiagnostik IDK® anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG assay, by the DiaSorin LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG assay, and by the Euroimmun anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG ELISA. Antibodies binding NC were detected by the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay and by the pan-immunoglobulin immunoassay Roche Elecsys® anti-SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, we investigated samples of a group of COVID-19 convalescent subjects that were primarily tested S1 IgG non-reactive. Samples were also tested by live virus and pseudovirus neutralization tests. Results: Overall, the IDK® anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG assay showed the highest sensitivity among the evaluated spike (S) protein-based assays. Additionally, the Immundiagnostik assay correlated well with serum-neutralizing activity. Conclusions: The novel IDK® anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG assay showed high sensitivity and specificity, representing a valid option for use in the routine diagnostic.
Keywords: COVID-19; antibody; coronavirus; humoral response; neutralization; non-responder; pandemic; protection; sensitivity; titer.
Conflict of interest statement
The University of Cologne (Medical Faculty) receives royalties for the co-development of the IDK® anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA and IDK® anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM ELISA kits. Immundiagnostik had no role in the design of this study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript except for the Supplement Figure S1, or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
References
-
- Seow J., Graham C., Merrick B., Acors S., Pickering S., Steel K.J.A., Hemmings O., O’Byrne A., Kouphou N., Galao R.P., et al. Longitudinal observation and decline of neutralizing antibody responses in the three months following SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans. Nat. Microbiol. 2020;5:1598–1607. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-00813-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Addetia A., Crawford K.H.D., Dingens A., Zhu H., Roychoudhury P., Huang M.L., Jerome K.R., Bloom J.D., Greninger A.L. Neutralizing Antibodies Correlate with Protection from SARS-CoV-2 in Humans during a Fishery Vessel Outbreak with a High Attack Rate. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020;58 doi: 10.1128/JCM.02107-20. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
