Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 5;11(3):695.
doi: 10.3390/ani11030695.

Legal Frameworks and Controls for the Protection of Research Animals: A Focus on the Animal Welfare Body with a French Case Study

Affiliations
Review

Legal Frameworks and Controls for the Protection of Research Animals: A Focus on the Animal Welfare Body with a French Case Study

Elisa Codecasa et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

In recent years, efforts have been devoted to improving the welfare of laboratory animals. Scientific progress and growing concerns over animal harm have pushed institutions to strengthen their laws to make science more humane and responsible. European Directive 2010/63/EU makes it mandatory for breeders, suppliers and users of laboratory animals to have an animal welfare body (AWB) to prioritize animal welfare and harmonize experimental standards while reassuring the public that research is being carried out appropriately. Based on application of the three Rs (refinement, reduction and replacement), these bodies provide staff with oversight and advisory functions to support compliance with the legal requirements on both animal housing and project realization. This review aims to present the legal measures protecting research animals, with a focus on European AWBs. The review explains how the mission of AWBs includes development of environmental enrichment programs and how animal training generates benefits not only for animal welfare but also for the research work environment and research quality. A French case study is conducted to provide the scientific community with an example of an AWB's functioning and activities, share its achievements and propose some perspectives for the future.

Keywords: French body; animal welfare; animal welfare body; laboratory animals; legislation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Hubrecht R.C. The Welfare of Animals Used in Research: Practice and Ethics. 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons; Oxford, UK: 2014. p. 271.
    1. Sandoe P., Franco N.H., Lund T.B., Weary D.M., Olsson I.A.S. Harms to animals—Can we agree on how best to limit them. ALTEX Proc. 2015;4:28–32.
    1. Olsson I.A.S., Silva S.P.D., Townend D., Sandøe P. Protecting animals and enabling research in the European Union: An overview of development and implementation of directive 2010/63/EU. ILAR J. 2016;57:347–357. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilw029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. European Union Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts. Off. J. Eur. Communities. 1997;340:10.
    1. Miliband D. Presented at Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty. Foreign and Commonwealth Office London; London, UK: Jan 21, 2008. [(accessed on 19 July 2020)]. Consolidated texts of the EU treaties as amended by the treaty of Lisbon; p. 336. Available online: www.fco.gov.uk.

LinkOut - more resources