Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 5;10(5):1082.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10051082.

Fragility Fractures and Imminent Fracture Risk in the Spanish Population: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Affiliations

Fragility Fractures and Imminent Fracture Risk in the Spanish Population: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Maria-José Montoya-García et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Fragility fractures constitute a major public health problem worldwide, causing important high morbidity and mortality rates. The aim was to present the epidemiology of fragility fractures and to assess the imminent risk of a subsequent fracture and mortality. This is a retrospective population-based cohort study (n = 1369) with a fragility fracture. We estimated the incidence rate of index fragility fractures and obtained information on the subsequent fractures and death during a follow-up of up to three years. We assessed the effect of age, sex, and skeletal site of index fracture as independent risk factors of further fractures and mortality. Incidence rate of index fragility fractures was 86.9/10,000 person-years, with highest rates for hip fractures in women aged ≥80 years. The risk of fracture was higher in subjects with a recent fracture (Relative Risk(RR), 1.80; p < 0.01). Higher age was an independent risk factor for further fracture events. Significant excess mortality was found in subjects aged ≥80 years and with a previous hip fracture (hazard ratio, 3.43 and 2.48, respectively). It is the first study in Spain to evaluate the incidence of major osteoporotic fractures, not only of the hip, and the rate of imminent fracture. Our results provide further evidence highlighting the need for early treatment.

Keywords: fracture risk; fragility fracture; imminent fracture risk; osteoporosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study participants based on the Strobe statement. A total of 1383 subjects were assessed for eligibility, among a study population of 157,428 inhabitants. Fracture miscoding or traumatic or pathological causes of fractures were the causes for the exclusion of 14 subjects. Subjects were enrolled from January 2014 to December 2014 and followed up until December 2016. Mean duration of follow-up was 2.3 years for all subjects, 2.2 years in males and 2.3 in females. The most frequent types of index fracture were wrist (N = 506, 37.0%) and hip (N = 431, 31.5%), followed closely by proximal humerus (N = 264, 19.3%). Overall, 99 subjects registered a subsequent fracture, with 120 events of death occurring throughout follow-up. Fx: fracture. SsFx: subsequent fracture.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Nelson–Aalen cumulative hazard of subsequent fracture events after an index fracture in men and women aged ≥50 years over a period of three years of follow-up. Cumulative risk of subsequent fracture increased over the years following initial fracture. However, no significant differences were found in the incidence rate of subsequent fractures over 1, 2, and 3 years, regardless of sex and age. Dotted line represents the cumulative incidence of subsequent fractures in all subjects. Solid line represents the cumulative incidence of subsequent fracture events in females. Dashed line represents the cumulative incidence of subsequent fracture events in males. SsFx: subsequent fracture. The Y-axis represents the cumulative hazard function. The X-axis represents follow-up years after the first fracture.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative risk of subsequent fractures among subjects with a previous fracture compared with the general population by sex (green box and square), age group (red box and circle), and index fracture site (blue box and triangle). Adjusted rate ratio estimated using Poisson regression models that included age, sex, and index fracture site as covariates. Corresponding data are presented in Supplementary Table S3. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

References

    1. Hernlund E., Svedbom A., Ivergard M., Compston J., Cooper C., Stenmark J., McCloskey E.V., Jonsson B., Kanis J.A. Osteoporosis in the European Union: Medical management, epidemiology and economic Burden: A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA) Arch. Osteoporos. 2013;8:136. doi: 10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shuid A.N., Khaithir T.M.N., Mokhtar S.A., Mohamed I.N., Nazrun A.S., Tzar M.N. A systematic review of the outcomes of osteoporotic fracture patients after hospital discharge: Morbidity, subsequent fractures, and mortality. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2014;10:937–948. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S72456. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kanis J.A. Assessment of Osteoporosis at the Primary Health Care Level. WHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School; Sheffield, UK: 2007. pp. 1–339. WHO Scientific Group Technical Report.
    1. Papaioannou A., Kennedy C. Diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis should be expanded. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3:234–236. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00049-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roux C., Briot K. Imminent fracture risk. Osteoporos. Int. 2017;28:1765–1769. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-3976-5. - DOI - PubMed