Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 5;22(5):2622.
doi: 10.3390/ijms22052622.

TNMplot.com: A Web Tool for the Comparison of Gene Expression in Normal, Tumor and Metastatic Tissues

Affiliations

TNMplot.com: A Web Tool for the Comparison of Gene Expression in Normal, Tumor and Metastatic Tissues

Áron Bartha et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Genes showing higher expression in either tumor or metastatic tissues can help in better understanding tumor formation and can serve as biomarkers of progression or as potential therapy targets. Our goal was to establish an integrated database using available transcriptome-level datasets and to create a web platform which enables the mining of this database by comparing normal, tumor and metastatic data across all genes in real time. We utilized data generated by either gene arrays from the Gene Expression Omnibus of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI-GEO) or RNA-seq from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET), and The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) repositories. The altered expression within different platforms was analyzed separately. Statistical significance was computed using Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis tests. False Discovery Rate (FDR) was computed using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. The entire database contains 56,938 samples, including 33,520 samples from 3180 gene chip-based studies (453 metastatic, 29,376 tumorous and 3691 normal samples), 11,010 samples from TCGA (394 metastatic, 9886 tumorous and 730 normal), 1193 samples from TARGET (1 metastatic, 1180 tumorous and 12 normal) and 11,215 normal samples from GTEx. The most consistently upregulated genes across multiple tumor types were TOP2A (FC = 7.8), SPP1 (FC = 7.0) and CENPA (FC = 6.03), and the most consistently downregulated gene was ADH1B (FC = 0.15). Validation of differential expression using equally sized training and test sets confirmed the reliability of the database in breast, colon, and lung cancer at an FDR below 10%. The online analysis platform enables unrestricted mining of the database and is accessible at TNMplot.com.

Keywords: RNA-seq; cancer; differential expression; gene array; transcriptomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Boxplots of top two genes differentially expressed in most of the ten common tumor types. Significant differences by a Mann–Whitney U test are marked with red color (* p < 0.01).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Boxplots of top two genes differentially expressed in most of the ten common tumor types. Significant differences by a Mann–Whitney U test are marked with red color (* p < 0.01).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Boxplots (A,D), bar charts (B,E) and violin plots (C,F) of TOP2A gene expression in breast (left) and colon cancer (right) when comparing paired normal and tumor gene array data. The bars represent the proportions of tumor samples that show higher expression of the selected gene compared to normal samples at each of the quantile cutoff values (minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum). Specificity is calculated by dividing the number of tumor samples with the sum of tumor and normal samples below each given cutoff. In cases where the fold change was over 1, those “over” were used instead of those “below”.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Boxplots (A,D), bar charts (B,E) and violin plots (C,F) of TOP2A gene expression in breast (left) and colon cancer (right) when comparing paired normal and tumor gene array data. The bars represent the proportions of tumor samples that show higher expression of the selected gene compared to normal samples at each of the quantile cutoff values (minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum). Specificity is calculated by dividing the number of tumor samples with the sum of tumor and normal samples below each given cutoff. In cases where the fold change was over 1, those “over” were used instead of those “below”.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Boxplots (A,D), bar charts (B,E) and violin plots (C,F) of ADH1B gene expression in breast (left) and colon cancer (right) when comparing paired normal and tumor gene array data. The bars represent the proportions of tumor samples that show higher expression of the selected gene compared to normal samples at each of the quantile cutoff values (minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum). Specificity is calculated by dividing the number of tumor samples with the sum of tumor and normal samples below each given cutoff. In cases where the fold change was over 1, those “over” were used instead of those “below”.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Boxplots (A,D), bar charts (B,E) and violin plots (C,F) of ADH1B gene expression in breast (left) and colon cancer (right) when comparing paired normal and tumor gene array data. The bars represent the proportions of tumor samples that show higher expression of the selected gene compared to normal samples at each of the quantile cutoff values (minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum). Specificity is calculated by dividing the number of tumor samples with the sum of tumor and normal samples below each given cutoff. In cases where the fold change was over 1, those “over” were used instead of those “below”.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Volcano plots and Venn diagrams of differentially expressed genes in breast, colon and lung cancer using equally sized training–test sets —Venn diagram (A) and Volcano plot (B) from breast cancer; Venn diagram (C) and Volcano plot (D) from colon cancer Venn diagram (E) and Volcano plot (F) from lung cancer.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Volcano plots and Venn diagrams of differentially expressed genes in breast, colon and lung cancer using equally sized training–test sets —Venn diagram (A) and Volcano plot (B) from breast cancer; Venn diagram (C) and Volcano plot (D) from colon cancer Venn diagram (E) and Volcano plot (F) from lung cancer.

Comment in

  • Paraoxonase-2 expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma.
    Campagna R, Pozzi V, Salvucci A, Togni L, Mascitti M, Sartini D, Salvolini E, Santarelli A, Lo Muzio L, Emanuelli M. Campagna R, et al. Hum Cell. 2023 May;36(3):1211-1213. doi: 10.1007/s13577-023-00875-w. Epub 2023 Feb 11. Hum Cell. 2023. PMID: 36774414 No abstract available.

References

    1. Zhang L., Zhou W., Velculescu V.E., Kern S.E., Hruban R.H., Hamilton S.R., Vogelstein B., Kinzler K.W. Gene expression profiles in normal and cancer cells. Science. 1997;276:1268–1272. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5316.1268. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Druker B.J., Tamura S., Buchdunger E., Ohno S., Segal G.M., Fanning S., Zimmermann J., Lydon N.B. Effects of a selective inhibitor of the Abl tyrosine kinase on the growth of Bcr-Abl positive cells. Nat. Med. 1996;2:561–566. doi: 10.1038/nm0596-561. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Menyhart O., Harami-Papp H., Sukumar S., Schafer R., Magnani L., de Barrios O., Gyorffy B. Guidelines for the selection of functional assays to evaluate the hallmarks of cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2016;1866:300–319. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2016.10.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lowe R., Shirley N., Bleackley M., Dolan S., Shafee T. Transcriptomics technologies. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017;13:e1005457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005457. - DOI - PMC - PubMed