Ensemble of Multiple Classifiers for Multilabel Classification of Plant Protein Subcellular Localization

Abstract

The accurate prediction of protein localization is a critical step in any functional genome annotation process. This paper proposes an improved strategy for protein subcellular localization prediction in plants based on multiple classifiers, to improve prediction results in terms of both accuracy and reliability. The prediction of plant protein subcellular localization is challenging because the underlying problem is not only a multiclass, but also a multilabel problem. Generally, plant proteins can be found in 10-14 locations/compartments. The number of proteins in some compartments (nucleus, cytoplasm, and mitochondria) is generally much greater than that in other compartments (vacuole, peroxisome, Golgi, and cell wall). Therefore, the problem of imbalanced data usually arises. Therefore, we propose an ensemble machine learning method based on average voting among heterogeneous classifiers. We first extracted various types of features suitable for each type of protein localization to form a total of 479 feature spaces. Then, feature selection methods were used to reduce the dimensions of the features into smaller informative feature subsets. This reduced feature subset was then used to train/build three different individual models. In the process of combining the three distinct classifier models, we used an average voting approach to combine the results of these three different classifiers that we constructed to return the final probability prediction. The method could predict subcellular localizations in both single- and multilabel locations, based on the voting probability. Experimental results indicated that the proposed ensemble method could achieve correct classification with an overall accuracy of 84.58% for 11 compartments, on the basis of the testing dataset.

Keywords: average voting; consensus voting; ensemble machine learning; feature extraction; feature selection; go term; plant protein; subcellular localization prediction.

Figure 1

Workflow of the program.

Figure 2

Top 20 features that are highly correlated with each localization target.