Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 16;11(3):745.
doi: 10.3390/nano11030745.

Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Carbon Nanofibres: More Than a Cobweb

Affiliations
Review

Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Carbon Nanofibres: More Than a Cobweb

Enrico Bergamaschi et al. Nanomaterials (Basel). .

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and carbon nanofibers (CNFs) are erroneously considered as singular material entities. Instead, they should be regarded as a heterogeneous class of materials bearing different properties eliciting particular biological outcomes both in vitro and in vivo. Given the pace at which the industrial production of CNTs/CNFs is increasing, it is becoming of utmost importance to acquire comprehensive knowledge regarding their biological activity and their hazardous effects in humans. Animal studies carried out by inhalation showed that some CNTs/CNFs species can cause deleterious effects such as inflammation and lung tissue remodeling. Their physico-chemical properties, biological behavior and biopersistence make them similar to asbestos fibers. Human studies suggest some mild effects in workers handling CNTs/CNFs. However, owing to their cross-sectional design, researchers have been as yet unable to firmly demonstrate a causal relationship between such an exposure and the observed effects. Estimation of acceptable exposure levels should warrant a proper risk management. The aim of this review is to challenge the conception of CNTs/CNFs as a single, unified material entity and prompt the establishment of standardized hazard and exposure assessment methodologies able to properly feed risk assessment and management frameworks.

Keywords: carbon nanofibers; carbon nanotubes; epidemiological studies; health effects; occupational exposure; occupational exposure limits; risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ghiazza M., Vietti E., Fenoglio I. Health and Environmental Safety of Nanomaterials. Woodhead Publishing Limited; Cambridge, UK: 2014. Carbon nanotubes: Properties; applications; and toxicity; pp. 147–194. - DOI
    1. Hansen S., Lennquist A. Carbon nanotubes added to the SIN List as a nanomaterial of Very High Concern. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010;15:3–4. doi: 10.1038/s41565-019-0613-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fadeel B., Kostarelos K. Grouping all carbon nanotubes into a single substance category is scientifically unjustified. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020;15:164. doi: 10.1038/s41565-020-0654-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fatkhutdinova L.M., Khaliullin T.O., Shvedova A.A. Carbon Nanotubes Exposure Risk Assessment: From Toxicology to Epidemiologic Studies (Overview of the Current Problem) Nanotechnol. Russ. 2015;10:501–509. doi: 10.1134/S1995078015030064. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jacobs M.M., Ellenbecker M., Hoppin P., Kriebel D., Tickner J. Precarious Promise: A Case Study of Engineered Carbon Nanotubes. Lowell Center for Sustainable Production. University of Massachusetts; Lowell, MA, USA: 2014. [(accessed on 15 November 2020)]. Available online: https://www.cleanproduction.org/static/ee_images/uploads/resources/ECN_c....