Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 22;10(3):331.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10030331.

Exploring Farmers' Reasons for Antibiotic Use and Misuse in Pig Farms in Brazil

Affiliations

Exploring Farmers' Reasons for Antibiotic Use and Misuse in Pig Farms in Brazil

Rita Albernaz-Gonçalves et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

Stressful management that makes farmed pigs susceptible to infections is associated with high antibiotic use (AMU) and resistance (AMR). Pig farmers are key stakeholders to support the international agenda pushing AMU restrictions. We interviewed 58 pig farmers on AMU/AMR, biosecurity, veterinary assistance, disease prevention and treatment, aiming to understand practices and attitudes towards the AMU/AMR problem. Farmers described a reliance on antibiotics to prevent and treat disease while neglecting biosecurity measures. We identified inappropriate AMU practices (high use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, incorrect dosage or treatment length) and unrestricted access to antibiotics, which encouraged imprudent AMU. Nevertheless, most farmers considered this AMU legitimate to guarantee herd productivity and showed unpreparedness and resistance to changing AMU practices, perceiving limitations (economic, sanitary and inspection) more easily than alternatives to reduce AMU. Agro-industries and foreign markets were mentioned, and internal consumers dismissed as potential motivators for behavioral changes. Importantly, farmers' economic, technical and social factors may limit their autonomy to change practices. We conclude that the observed distancing of pig farmers from the AMU/AMR problem limits the efficiency of policies aiming for a prudent AMU. Our study indicates a need for education, training and behavior change nudging that should include other stakeholders beyond farmers.

Keywords: AMR; AMU; antimicrobial; attitudes; livestock; prudent use of antibiotics; swine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We have no conflicts of interest associated with this publication.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of pig production models in Brazil.

References

    1. World Health Organization . World Health Organization; 2015. [(accessed on 18 March 2020)]. Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. Available online: www.wpro.who.int/entity/drug_resistance/resources/global_action_plan_eng.... - PubMed
    1. Barton M.D. Impact of antibiotic use in the swine industry. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2014;19:9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2014.05.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Boeckel T.P., Brower C., Gilbert M., Grenfell B.T., Levina S., Robinson T.P., Teillant A., Laxminarayan R. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:5649–5654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503141112. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Minssen T., Outterson K., Van Katwyk S.R., Batista P.H.D., Chandler C.I.R., Ciabuschi F., Harbarth S., Kesselheim A.S., Laxminarayan R., Liddell K., et al. Social, cultural and economic aspects of antimicrobial resistance. Bull. World Health Organ. 2020;98:823A–882A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.275875. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Boeckel T.P., Glennon E.E., Chen D., Gilbert M., Robinson T.P., Grenfell B.B., Levin S.A.S., Bonhoeffer S., Laxminarayan R.R. Reducing antimicrobial use in food animals. Science. 2017;357:1350–1352. doi: 10.1126/science.aao1495. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources